Crypto Crunch: MiCA Regulation Uncovers Banks' Critical Execution Gap
Finery Markets' latest reports reveal a significant structural shift in the digital asset market driven by MiCA, focusing on liquidity growth, particularly for euro stablecoins, over firm headcount. Institutional OTC trading is surging while centralized exchanges decline, as banks with digital asset budgets still lag in bringing trading products to production. The firm offers non-custodial solutions to bridge this gap, with updated platforms and deployment models amid evolving global regulations.One hundred days after the MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) 1 July registration deadline, a new perspective on the European digital asset landscape has emerged. While 280 firms are on ESMA's initial list, a significant reduction from the 2,747 operating under national transitional regimes in 2024, the more crucial insight, according to institutional crypto trading infrastructure firm Finery Markets, is a structural shift towards liquidity rather than mere headcount. This observation, detailed in two reports published by Finery Markets in October 2026, highlights a profound change occurring beneath the surface of regulatory compliance.
A notable trend is the accelerated growth of euro-denominated stablecoins. EURC, the euro-denominated stablecoin issued by Circle, experienced a remarkable 46-fold increase in volume on the Finery Markets platform year-on-year during the first nine months of 2026. Despite this surge, EURC still represents a small fraction, 0.12%, of the total stablecoin flow through the network. Overall, the supply of euro stablecoins has grown by 22.6% this year, reaching approximately $848 million, in stark contrast to the stagnant supply of dollar-denominated stablecoins. These figures confirm that MiCA has indeed initiated a race to build native euro liquidity, which, as the report indicates, is primarily a test of volume and adoption rather than simply availability.
The first Finery Markets report, drawing from OTC data covering 16 million institutional spot trades over nine months, reveals significant shifts in trading activity. OTC volume saw a substantial 57% year-on-year growth, while the top 20 centralized exchanges collectively experienced a 47% loss in comparable activity. Stablecoins now constitute a dominant 83% of trades on the network, with key contributors including Banking Circle, Fipto, The Vault, and identity and compliance firm Sumsub.
The second report, focusing on bank strategy in digital assets, uncovers a significant disparity between intent and execution. While an overwhelming 89% of banks have an active budget allocated for digital assets, only a small minority (16%) have anything in production. Among the largest institutions surveyed, including JPMorgan, Citi, BNY, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Standard Chartered, Société Générale, Deutsche Bank, BBVA, and Revolut, nearly every live product relies on third-party infrastructure. Solutions for custody, tokenized deposits, and exchange-traded product access have been successfully delivered, but direct trading capabilities have not.
This 'gap' in direct trading capabilities forms the commercial foundation of Finery Markets' offering. The firm contends that custody addresses a security concern but does not generate revenue. The logical follow-up client request after custody is the ability to trade held assets without routing them to an exchange that the bank does not control. Developing such capabilities internally presents considerable challenges, including the need for separate bilateral liquidity relationships, each with its own credit agreement, fragmented pricing that complicates best-execution obligations, and a settlement infrastructure build measured in quarters rather than weeks.
Finery Markets presents an alternative: a non-custodial connection to firm liquidity across more than 200 crypto and fiat pairs. This solution offers automated netting, role-based access controls, and a comprehensive audit trail. The firm provides two deployment models: a white-label master account, where the bank remains the regulated counterparty, and a full white-label network, enabling clients to trade directly with one another, thereby typically allowing the bank to avoid the capital requirements associated with a broker-dealer license.
The broader regulatory landscape continues to evolve and shape these developments. In the US, the OCC has granted 16 digital asset trust charters within a ten-month period. Globally, initiatives such as the GENIUS Act, MiCA, the UK's evolving digital assets regime, and Basel III capital treatment of crypto exposures are all influencing what banks can offer and at what cost. Roughly one-fifth of the current MiCA register is now comprised of banks, reflecting both an increasing appetite for digital assets and the significant compliance overhead that smaller, specialist Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) have been quicker to absorb.
In addition to these market insights, Finery Markets disclosed two platform updates. Their connectivity hub now allows institutional participants to store exchange API credentials directly within the platform interface, integrating price discovery from venues covering what the firm estimates as over two-thirds of global crypto liquidity. Furthermore, the white-label stack has been enhanced with embedded API documentation, which the company claims has reduced client integration timelines by a factor of 18.7 compared to a previous baseline. This accelerated integration is attributed to an AI-assisted integration repository, though the 18.7 multiplier is not independently benchmarked in the release. The firm also co-hosted a private luncheon at TOKEN2049 Singapore, alongside Caladan, Utila, and Stablecoin Insider, attracting approximately 150 professionals from various sectors including OTC trading, market making, payments, and stablecoin infrastructure. The consensus from these industry conversations, as reported by Finery Markets, is that the fastest-growing firms are increasingly treating routing, settlement, and prefunding as critical infrastructure decisions rather than mere operational workarounds.