Colbert's Unaired Interview Becomes Viral Sensation, Fuels Candidate's Campaign Amidst CBS Controversy

Published 1 hour ago3 minute read
Precious Eseaye
Precious Eseaye
Colbert's Unaired Interview Becomes Viral Sensation, Fuels Candidate's Campaign Amidst CBS Controversy

"The Late Show With Stephen Colbert" faced a significant broadcast challenge when CBS reportedly blocked its interview with Texas State Rep. James Talarico from airing on television, citing fears of retribution from the FCC. This decision, however, inadvertently propelled the interview to viral status on digital platforms, drawing millions of views and substantial campaign donations for Talarico.

On Monday's broadcast, Stephen Colbert informed his audience that CBS lawyers had forbidden the inclusion of Talarico's interview, explaining it was due to the FCC's "equal time" rule. This rule mandates that broadcast networks provide equivalent airtime to opposing political candidates. Colbert highlighted that while news and talk shows traditionally enjoyed an exemption from these demands, FCC Chair Brendan Carr had suggested this exemption should no longer apply to programs he characterized as "motivated by partisan purposes," particularly targeting left-leaning outlets like late-night talk shows. Colbert accused CBS of "unilaterally enforcing" the rule as if Carr had already eliminated the exception, even preventing him from showing a photo of Talarico or mentioning the ban on air.

The controversy intensified on Tuesday when CBS issued a statement asserting, "'The Late Show' was not prohibited by CBS from broadcasting the interview with Rep. James Talarico. The show was provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled. 'The Late Show' decided to present the interview through its YouTube channel with on-air promotion on the broadcast rather than potentially providing the equal-time options."

Colbert swiftly responded to CBS's statement on his Tuesday show, critiquing the corporation for releasing it "without ever talking to me" and presenting it as a surprisingly small piece of paper "considering how many butts it’s trying to cover." He also implied a financial motive behind the decision, referencing CBS's previous statement about the purely financial reasons for ending "The Late Show" in May 2026.

Despite the broadcast block, the interview quickly became a sensation online. Posted on YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and Instagram, the clip amassed over 5.3 million views on YouTube within 48 hours, reaching 4 million views on TikTok and 400,000 likes on Instagram. James Talarico's campaign capitalized on this newfound attention, raising an astounding $2.5 million in the 24 hours following Colbert's revelation of the broadcast ban. Many YouTube commenters noted the irony that they would not have sought out an interview with a relatively unknown politician had CBS not attempted to block it, with one viewer writing, "Not gonna lie, I probably woulda skipped this if CBS and FCC hadn’t tried to ban it."

The rapid success of the Talarico interview positions it among "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert's" most-viewed political interviews, a remarkable feat given its short time online compared to clips from prior to 2019 that have accumulated years of traffic. For comparison, Colbert's most-watched political interview remains with then-candidate Donald Trump (17.85 million views, Sept. 23, 2015), followed by President Barack Obama (14.86 million, Oct. 18, 2016), and two with then-New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (9.85 million and 8.26 million). Other high-performing interviews include former President Jimmy Carter (8.14 million), then-FBI director James Comey (7.25 million), and then-former Vice President Joe Biden (6.51 million).

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, the agency’s only Democratic commissioner, weighed in on the controversy, condemning the move to "censor" Colbert as another instance of "corporate capitulation" to the Trump administration's influence.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

You may also like...