The Confederation of African Football is facing major leadership changes following the resignation of General Secretary Véron Mosengo-Omba. Nigeria’s Samson Adamu has been appointed interim General Secretary after approval by CAF’s Executive Committee during a meeting in Cairo.

Adamu will oversee daily operations while CAF vice-presidents begin a formal process to appoint a permanent replacement in the coming months. The organization said the transition aims to ensure administrative stability during a turbulent period for African football.

Mosengo-Omba confirmed his departure after more than three decades working in global football administration. In a statement shared via CAF’s official website, he said he wanted to focus on personal projects after clearing allegations that had been raised during his tenure.

Swiss authorities had previously investigated claims of financial misconduct, but the probe was closed due to lack of evidence. Mosengo-Omba said the outcome allowed him to leave the role “with peace of mind.”

The 66-year-old administrator, who holds Congolese and Swiss nationality, had led CAF since March 2021. His tenure faced criticism over governance concerns and his decision to remain in office beyond the organization’s official retirement age of 63.

CAF also faced internal complaints from employees who alleged a toxic workplace culture, although a subsequent investigation cleared him of wrongdoing. The controversy nonetheless added pressure on the organization’s leadership and governance.

Mosengo-Omba’s resignation comes as CAF grapples with fallout from controversial decisions surrounding the Africa Cup of Nations and other competitions. Questions about transparency intensified after several high-profile rulings and tournament postponements.

One of the most disputed cases involved the 2025 AFCON final between Senegal and Morocco. After protests during a late penalty decision, CAF’s appeals body later overturned Senegal’s victory and awarded Morocco a 3-0 forfeit win.

Senegal has challenged the ruling at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, keeping the dispute active. The case has fueled wider debate about officiating, governance, and decision-making within African football’s governing body.