Scroll through any corner of pop-psychology social media and you're likely to encounter a familiar dichotomy: the narcissist and the empath. One is the predator, the other the prey. One manipulates, the other absorbs. One loves themselves too much, the other not enough. The world, according to the Instagram therapists and YouTube life coaches, is divided into these two camps—and if you’ve ever felt drained after a conversation, congratulations, you’re probably an empath.

This binary is comforting. It makes complicated interpersonal dynamics feel legible. It flatters us with the implication that our suffering at the hands of others is not only unjust but diagnostic. It’s not that two people were incompatible or lacked communication skills—it’s that one was a narcissist, and the other was an empath. Clear-cut. Done. “Share this reel and heal.”

But this narrative, seductive as it is, oversimplifies the rich and often uncomfortable truth about human behavior. Worse, it risks creating the very dynamics it seeks to expose: turning "empaths" into a moral elite whose righteousness can easily slip into actual narcissism, and flattening narcissism into a cartoon villainy that fails to distinguish between disorder and personality, pathology and pain.

The truth is: empaths can be manipulative. And sometimes, the empath is the narcissist.

The Empath on a Pedestal

Image Credit: Unsplash

The word "empath" has become a kind of spiritual virtue signal in the age of self-diagnosis. Originally popularized in New Age circles and later co-opted by trauma-informed therapy influencers, the empath is described as someone who feels deeply, absorbs others’ emotions, and often suffers in relationships with selfish or abusive people. There's truth to some of this—many people are highly sensitive and attuned to the moods of those around them.

But the way the empath is framed in internet psychology often borders on sainthood. The empath is always patient, self-sacrificing, and perpetually victimized. They are coded as morally superior by default. Their flaws, if mentioned, are reframed as wounds: “You give too much. You love too deeply.”

In reality, emotional sensitivity is not the same as emotional intelligence. Being attuned to others' feelings doesn't always make someone kind or wise. Empaths, like everyone else, are capable of manipulation, projection, and passive aggression. And when their identity is built on being the “good one” in every relationship, their behavior becomes harder to critique—because to question them feels like siding with the narcissist.

This is where the binary becomes dangerous. When we put empaths on a pedestal, we allow certain narcissistic traits—self-centeredness, moral superiority, emotional control—to go unchecked.

The Many Masks of Narcissism

“Narcissist” has become a catch-all insult in modern discourse. It’s thrown around to describe anyone who is vain, selfish, arrogant, or emotionally unavailable. But in psychological terms, narcissism is not one thing—it’s a spectrum of traits and behaviors that manifest in different forms. And many of them don’t look like the stereotypical grandstanding, selfie-obsessed egomaniac we picture.

Psychologists identify several types of narcissism, each with distinct patterns:

• Grandiose narcissism is the classic form: confident, dominant, attention-seeking. These individuals often appear charismatic and self-assured, but lack empathy and exploit others for validation.
  

• Covert (or vulnerable) narcissism is marked by hypersensitivity, insecurity, and passive-aggression. These individuals may seem shy or introverted but harbor deep resentment and a belief in their specialness.
  

• Communal narcissism presents as altruism. These people claim to care deeply about others and may even work in helping professions—but their sense of self is inflated by their perceived moral superiority. “Look how much I give,” is the unspoken refrain.
  

• Malignant narcissism is the most toxic blend, incorporating antisocial behavior, sadism, and paranoia. It overlaps significantly with traits seen in psychopathy.
  

• Overt narcissism, often used interchangeably with grandiose, is the loud, boastful version; easily spotted but not necessarily the most dangerous.
  

When we recognize that narcissism can be loud or quiet, charming or wounded, giving or cruel, the empath-narcissist binary begins to crumble. Suddenly, the “helpful” friend who constantly centers their emotional labor in every situation starts to look a little… narcissistic. Suddenly, the "gentle" empath who demands constant recognition for their sensitivity starts to seem a little… manipulative.

Enter: The Dark Empath

A term gaining traction in recent years is the dark empath—a person who is highly attuned to others' emotions but uses that skill strategically, even exploitatively. Think of someone who can sense your vulnerabilities not to comfort you, but to control you. They know when to be tender, when to withdraw, when to mirror your feelings back to you to gain trust.

These people weaponize empathy. They’re often praised for their emotional depth and insight, even as they subtly orchestrate situations to their advantage. Unlike the overt narcissist who demands the spotlight, the dark empath wants you to offer it voluntarily—out of guilt, admiration, or dependency.

Are they narcissists? Perhaps. But more importantly, they reveal the core fallacy of the empath/narcissist binary: empathy and narcissism are not opposites. They can coexist. In fact, some of the most successful narcissists require empathy—because without it, they wouldn't know how to manipulate your emotions.

Escaping the Binary

Image Credit: Unsplash

The danger of dividing the world into narcissists and empaths is indescribable. It allows people to outsource responsibility for conflict. It invites self-righteousness under the guise of healing. And it discourages introspection by placing one group forever in the role of villain, the other forever in the role of victim.

More useful than labeling others or ourselves, is looking at behaviors. Am I centering myself in every interaction, even when someone else is in pain? Do I use my sensitivity as a shield against criticism? Am I confusing empathy with enmeshment, or generosity with control?

At its best, empathy is a bridge—a way to understand others without erasing them, to connect without absorbing. Narcissism, when it becomes disordered, is a moat—a deep protection around a fragile self. But most of us fall somewhere in between. We have moments of ego, moments of attunement, and countless messy interactions shaped by culture, trauma, biology, and choice.

The Harder Path: Nuance

There’s nothing wrong with seeking language to understand the world. Psychology should empower us to name patterns, set boundaries, and heal. But healing begins with complexity, not caricature.

Real growth comes not from choosing a camp, but from asking harder questions:

Where am I wounded? Where am I responsible? And how do I avoid becoming the very thing I fear in others?