PDP Turmoil: Bode George Demands Judiciary's Protection Amidst Crisis!

Chief Bode George, former PDP deputy national chairman, has expressed serious concerns over a recent court judgment regarding the party's leadership dispute. He has called on the National Judicial Council to uphold judicial integrity, emphasizing that the court's dismissal of the BoT's suit and significant cost awards threaten constitutional governance and public trust. George also criticized the Nyesom Wike-led faction's reported expulsion of senior party members.
Pelumi Ilesanmi
Pelumi IlesanmiPolitics2 hours ago3 minute read
Key Points
Chief Bode George, a PDP chieftain, has appealed to the National Judicial Council (NJC) over a controversial court judgment concerning the party's leadership dispute.
The court dismissed a suit seeking to compel INEC to reflect existing judgments on PDP leadership and awarded N150 million in costs against the party's Board of Trustees and its counsel.
George also criticized the reported expulsion of senior PDP members by a faction led by Nyesom Wike, calling the action illogical and inconsistent with party structure.
PDP Turmoil: Bode George Demands Judiciary's Protection Amidst Crisis!

Chief Bode George, a former deputy national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has voiced profound concerns regarding a recent court judgment linked to the party's ongoing leadership dispute. In an open letter addressed to the chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC), Chief George implored the body to uphold the independence, integrity, and credibility of the Nigerian judiciary. He stated that his motivation to speak out stemmed from his role as a concerned citizen, a committed democrat, and a member of the PDP Board of Trustees (BoT), noting that recent developments have severely questioned public confidence in the administration of justice and the judiciary's role in safeguarding constitutional democracy.

The lawsuit in question was initiated by the chairman and members of the PDP Board of Trustees. Its primary objective was to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to adhere to existing judgments from the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and Federal High Court. This compliance, according to Chief George, was necessary to update INEC's official records to accurately reflect the authentic leadership of the party, which he identified as being under Chief Kabiru Tanimu Turaki (SAN).

However, rather than addressing the fundamental constitutional issues presented in the suit – specifically, whether INEC was legally obligated to implement the subsisting judgments – the court opted to dismiss the action. The court controversially labeled the proceedings as a "waste of judicial time" and subsequently awarded substantial costs: N140 million against the PDP Board of Trustees and an additional N10 million against its legal counsel. Chief George described this outcome as deeply troubling, asserting that the implications of these issues extend far beyond the internal machinations of the PDP, touching instead upon the broader foundational principles of constitutional governance and the unwavering rule of law.

He emphatically maintained that judgments delivered by the Supreme Court and other superior courts are unequivocally binding on all authorities unless and until they are set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction. He further stressed that no administrative body possesses the legal authority to disregard such established judicial pronouncements. Beyond the court's decision, the PDP chieftain also castigated the reported expulsion of several senior party members by the faction led by Nyesom Wike. Chief George characterized these expulsions as both illogical and fundamentally inconsistent with the established structure of the party.

"It is the greatest joke in the civilised international community today. Morally and ethically, is it possible for a child to expel a father from his house whilst the father is still alive," Chief George remarked, highlighting the absurdity of the faction's actions. Concluding his statement, he reiterated the judiciary's unique and paramount position as the guardian of the Constitution and the rule of law. He issued a stern warning that any public perception of political influence or constitutional inconsistency embedded within judicial decisions has the potential to severely erode public trust in the integrity and impartiality of the courts.

Loading...