The autumn recruitment season, often dubbed the “second new year” in hiring circles, is traditionally a period of heightened activity as companies seek to fill crucial roles before the festive break. However, with UK graduate job openings at their lowest since 2018, the competition for coveted positions has intensified significantly. In this challenging landscape, while much focus is understandably placed on crafting impeccable CVs and thorough interview preparation, experts are highlighting another critical factor that can make or break a candidate's chances: their choice of outfit. Psychologist Dr. George Sik, a workplace behaviour specialist at eras, underscores the rapid formation of first impressions, stating, “First impressions are made in as little as seven seconds. Your clothes aren’t the whole story, but they are the frame through which the rest of you is judged. The wrong choices can speak volumes before you’ve even said a word.”

Collaborating with Dr. Sik, Julian Nelson, founder of workplace footwear retailer A Fine Pair of Shoes and a dress code specialist, has identified five common sartorial blunders that can undermine an interview. The first mistake involves wearing white or overly busy patterns. While white often conveys cleanliness and professionalism, Dr. Sik cautions that it can inadvertently project a "clinical" image, associating it with hospital coats and painting a candidate as sterile rather than approachable. Furthermore, white fabrics are notoriously prone to showing stains instantly, a considerable risk when nerves are high. Conversely, busy prints and loud patterns can create "visual noise," overwhelming the interviewer's eye. Dr. Sik, with over 25 years of experience in hiring psychology, explains that "our brains are wired to look for order, especially in stressful settings like interviews." He adds, "When someone wears overly busy patterns, it creates a kind of visual noise that can leave the impression of disorganisation."

The second common pitfall relates to footwear: wearing shoes one cannot comfortably walk in. This includes brand-new, unbroken-in heels or excessively casual trainers. A slight limp or stumble caused by uncomfortable shoes can be a significant distraction, drawing attention away from the candidate's responses and qualifications. Julian Nelson emphasizes the symbolic weight of shoes, stating, “Polished, well-chosen shoes signal readiness. But shoes that compromise how you move project uncertainty and lack of preparation instead.”

Distracting jewellery constitutes the third mistake. Even seemingly tasteful pieces can become an impediment if they jangle audibly or incessantly catch the interviewer’s eye. Overly large rings or dangling earrings can also appear fussy or detract from a professional image. Dr. Sik advises, “The interviewer should have nothing distracting them from listening to what you have to say,” underscoring the importance of minimizing any visual or auditory interference.

The fourth mistake often overlooked by candidates focusing solely on their attire is an overstuffed or scruffy bag. Recruiters frequently note candidates arriving with battered backpacks, which send conflicting messages. Julian Nelson warns that “a bulging, messy bag can hint at disorganisation,” and instead recommends opting for a slim, professional bag or portfolio that clearly communicates a business-ready demeanor. Dr. Sik further elaborates that “a professional bag communicates respect for the setting and for yourself.”

Finally, smartwatches represent the fifth interview faux pas. Even if not actively responding to messages, the simple act of flicking one’s wrist to check notifications can create a subconscious perception of distraction or disengagement. Dr. Sik explains, “It creates a subconscious perception that you’re not fully present, which is exactly the opposite of what you want in an interview.” He strongly advises leaving smartwatches in a bag during the interview to prevent appearing nervous or 'clock-watching.'

By carefully considering and avoiding these common sartorial and accessory mistakes, candidates can significantly enhance their professional presentation, allowing their qualifications, experience, and communication skills to be the primary focus of the interviewer.