The intensifying race for the Patriotic Front (PF) Presidency has brought two prominent figures, Makebi Zulu and Brian Mundubile, to the forefront, setting the stage for a tightly contested leadership battle within the party. Both candidates command substantial followings, but their paths to contention, as well as their respective strengths and vulnerabilities, paint a complex picture of the PF’s future.

Long before Makebi Zulu publicly declared his presidential ambitions, close associates and family sources revealed his long-standing aspiration for the PF’s top position. Zulu reportedly confided in relatives and had been quietly working to secure the endorsement of the late former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu (ECL) before his passing. Following Lungu’s death, Zulu’s political strategy intensified. Recognizing the fierce competition within the PF, he reportedly concluded that a posthumous endorsement from the former Head of State would be his most viable path to success.

To solidify his position, Zulu cultivated close relationships with influential members of Lungu’s inner circle. This included former Mines Minister and PF Member of the Central Committee Richard Musukwa, as well as Archbishop Dr. Alick Banda. Archbishop Banda himself has faced scrutiny and caution from the Vatican for conducting a mass for the non-Catholic late President Lungu. Observers noted that Zulu’s recent meeting with Archbishop Banda upon returning to Zambia from South Africa was strategically timed. Sources indicate that the clergyman advised Zulu to anchor his campaign narrative to Lungu’s legacy, reportedly suggesting that “the body of ECL will only rest once Makebi becomes President.”

However, this strategy has not been universally welcomed within the PF. Some members express anger, viewing Zulu’s approach as an exploitation of Lungu’s death for political gain. Questions have arisen regarding the authenticity of his support from former First Lady Esther Lungu, with critics speculating that Zulu may have leveraged past legal services to exert influence. Accusations of arrogance also plague Zulu’s image, with detractors claiming he perceives himself as superior to other contenders. Despite this growing resentment, Zulu appears confident that his calculated moves will secure the support of both PF members and the broader Zambian public, leaving his motives, whether genuine loyalty or political manipulation, to be revealed over time.

In contrast, Brian Mundubile appears to hold a slight advantage in the race, primarily due to the significant backing he enjoys from a majority of PF Members of Parliament. Their influence is expected to be crucial in swaying the party’s electoral college ahead of the much-anticipated convention. Mundubile’s extensive engagement with PF structures nationwide has enabled him to build a robust grassroots presence, further complemented by his strong interpersonal skills and proven ability to connect with party members. His successful retention of his parliamentary seat stands as a testament to his political acumen and leadership appeal.

Nonetheless, Mundubile’s candidacy is not without controversy. Persistent questions linger regarding alleged benefits he received from government contracts during his tenure as Minister for the Northern Province. Should these allegations gain significant traction, they could prove politically damaging to his campaign.

Makebi Zulu, a distinguished lawyer and outspoken politician, draws his primary strength from the general membership of the PF, particularly ordinary party followers outside formal structures. While his legal career has garnered national recognition, it has also attracted criticism. Some within the party question his moral standing, citing his legal representation of controversial figures, notably Shadreck Kasanda, who was implicated in the KKIA gold scandal. Zulu’s critics also accuse him of political opportunism, asserting that he is leveraging the legacy and even the "body," of the late former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu for personal political advancement. Analysts suggest that his apparent prioritization of political ambition over the dignified burial of ECL could alienate a segment of loyal PF supporters.

Given the distinct strengths and notable vulnerabilities exhibited by both candidates, observers within the PF suggest a potential solution might lie in pairing them on a joint ticket, with one serving as president and the other as running mate. Whatever the ultimate outcome, the PF’s upcoming convention is poised to be a pivotal moment, instrumental in defining the party’s quest to regain political relevance ahead of the 2026 general elections.