Introduction

Imagine arriving as a guest at a friend’s homestead in a remote village. You’re welcomed warmly, offered food, laughter, and a place by the evening fireside. But as dusk deepens, a subtle tension fills the air. Your host rises, gestures toward the guest room, and you follow politely, until you notice his wife quietly gathering her skirt, her eyes downcast, her steps hesitant yet deliberate.

For that night, tradition demands that she attends to you, the guest. She walks in silently, carrying the weight of expectation. Her smile is practiced, her composure fragile. And you, uncertain of your own power in that moment, stand caught between gratitude and guilt.

This is not a scene from myth, it is the lived reality of okujepisa omukazendu, an ancient Himba custom deeply woven into hospitality and male honor. Yet for women bound by it, the line between social ritual and personal subjugation is painfully thin.

In many telling ways, that uneasy moment embodies a universal question that stretches far beyond one culture or tribe: What happens when hospitality crosses the line into coercion?

The Custom Unpacked

The Himba people of northern Namibia, and some related communities, practice a tradition known as okujepisa omukazendu, loosely translated as “sharing a spousal bed to show strong friendship.” Under certain circumstances, a male visitor (often a relative or close acquaintance) may be offered the host’s wife for the night. The gesture is positioned by tradition as one of trust, alliance building, and absolute loyalty. It claims to show: “I have nothing to hide from you; I place my wife, a sacred part of my life, under your watch.”

Photo credit: Pinterest

In theory, there are limits: the visitor is known, not random; the host remains part of the social bond; and the practice is framed as part of reciprocal obligations of hospitality. But that framing masks the deeper structure: by tradition, women’s bodies become instruments of male diplomacy. Their autonomy is overshadowed by the social prestige of male hospitality.

Some outside observers have misrepresented the practice, claiming that entire tribes in parts Africa or other places “routinely give their wives to guests.” Careful ethnographic work debunks these sweeping claims, reminding us that accuracy matters.While this custom is largely confined to this specific region, and its misrepresentation often stems from an exoticized outsider’s gaze, we cannot dismiss the fact that it remains a genuine way of life for a group of people. Mere opinions or condemnation won’t erase it, what’s needed instead is a thoughtful balance between cultural respect and the pursuit of human dignity.

Patriarchy, Consent, and the Silent Burden

At the basis, okujepisa omukazendu exposes the uneasy intersection between patriarchy and consent, two forces that have shaped gender relations in much of traditional Africa. In patriarchal societies, authority is often constructed around male privilege: men hold the power, set the rules, and define morality. Within this framework, women are expected to embody obedience, loyalty, and service, even when that service infringes on their autonomy.

In the context of this custom, the feminist critique is not simply about cultural condemnation but about questioning power imbalance. A wife in a deeply patriarchal household, economically dependent, socially confined, and bound by ancestral norms, rarely has the freedom to say “no.” Refusal could bring humiliation, rejection, or even violence. Thus, the practice transforms hospitality into a ritual of control, granting men symbolic rights over women’s bodies under the guise of friendship and trust.

Even in rare instances where a woman voices hesitation, her choice is easily drowned out by community expectations and male hierarchies. She is seen not as an autonomous person but as a vessel of alliance, a bridge between two men’s honor. In such spaces, consent becomes performative, extracted through pressure rather than given through freedom.

Public health experts add another layer to this conversation. In communities where healthcare access is limited and discussions about sexual safety remain taboo, okujepisa omukazendu heightens the risks of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. For many women, the expectation of silence, of not questioning or refusing, leaves them doubly vulnerable. The act, meant to symbolize respect and camaraderie among men, too often becomes a silent assault on women’s dignity, health, and humanity.

Ultimately, patriarchy is not only about male dominance but about systems that normalize women’s sacrifice for social cohesion. In the case of okujepisa omukazendu, it transforms a simple gesture of hospitality into an emblem of inequality, one that forces society to ask: when culture commands obedience, who truly benefits, and at whose cost?

Women’s Perspectives: Between Resistance and Survival

In a world increasingly shaped by feminism and women’s empowerment, the persistence of customs like okujepisa omukazendu poses a troubling question: what does empowerment mean for the average woman in remote, patriarchal communities where silence still equates to survival?

In the most logical way coupled with the intersection of emotions, many women from these regions would actually see this practice as deeply oppressive, a violation of intimacy and personhood. This may be associated with moments of humiliation, trauma, and coerced submission. Others speak of subtle negotiations: delaying the act, insisting on protection, or outright refusal when backed by supportive female elders. These acts, though small, reflect quiet forms of resistance within constrained realities.

Photo credit: pinterest

A few narrate instances where the ritual was reframed, moments when the woman’s participation was voluntary, often tied to expressions of loyalty or communal solidarity during social crises. Yet these rare exceptions do not dismantle the larger truth: structural inequality defines the boundaries of what “consent” can mean.

For many women, rejecting such customs carries steep consequences, social alienation, ridicule, or even violence. In a system that limits their choices, silence becomes a strategy of endurance. It is not acceptance; it is survival.

Reimagining Hospitality: From Bonding to Boundaries

Hospitality, at its core, is an act of generosity, a bridge between host and guest. It is not inherently toxic. Yet when hospitality demands the body of a woman, it ceases to be kindness and becomes coercion. True hospitality respects dignity, autonomy, and consent. The challenge, therefore, is not to erase tradition but to reimagine it. Several communities can begin this process by creating new forms of welcome that preserve cultural warmth without breaching personal boundaries. Ceremonies of symbolic offering, communal feasts, or spiritual rites now replace the physical exchange once demanded.

In sustained and renewed practices that might be adopted, women would not passive participants but central cultural agents, storytellers, spiritual guides, and custodians of change. To reimagine hospitality is to redefine value: honoring a woman’s selfhood as deeply as a man’s pride.

When culture evolves to include women’s voices, hospitality ceases to be a burden, it becomes a shared dignity.

Okujepisa omukazendu sits at a crossroads: between loyalty and violation, tradition and accountability, hospitality and control. Seen through a feminist lens, it reveals how power stubbornly lingers in ritual, how women’s bodies can become battlegrounds for masculine identity.

The path forward is not erasing tradition, but curating it: preserving what uplifts, discarding what harms. It demands humility, courage, and leadership from women inside communities. It demands that hospitality never become a loophole for disembowelment of consent.

If a culture is only as strong as its respect for the vulnerable, then the real test is this: Can a society make space for dissent, autonomy, and evolving identities, without losing its soul?