Trump's Sweet Talk: Coke's Alleged Cane Sugar Shift Sparking Health Debate

Published 3 months ago3 minute read
Precious Eseaye
Precious Eseaye
Trump's Sweet Talk: Coke's Alleged Cane Sugar Shift Sparking Health Debate

President Donald Trump recently announced via social media that Coca-Cola had agreed to replace high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar in its regular Coke sold in the U.S. He touted this as a positive development, stating, "This will be a very good move by them — You’ll see. It’s just better!" However, the Associated Press noted that Coca-Cola had yet to confirm this reported switch, raising questions among consumers and health experts about the actual implications of such a change for health.

Historically, American Coke was formulated with cane sugar. The company transitioned to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the early 1980s, primarily due to it being a cheaper sweetener. HFCS is a liquid sweetener derived from cornstarch and is categorized as a refined sugar, meaning it's processed from natural sources to yield pure sugar, devoid of other nutrients. Interestingly, many regions globally continue to use cane sugar in Coke, with Mexican Coke—often sold in glass bottles in the U.S.—being a prime example.

Despite public perception, nutrition experts largely agree that Coke sweetened with cane sugar offers no health advantage over its high-fructose corn syrup counterpart. Both cane sugar, sourced from sugarcane or sugar beets, and high-fructose corn syrup are refined sugars. Lisa Moskovitz, RD, CDN, CEO of the NY Nutrition Group, highlighted that while cane sugar might appear healthier due to its "natural" origin, this "halo effect stops there."

From a nutritional standpoint, the two sweeteners are strikingly similar. Both possess comparable molecular structures, featuring an approximate 50/50 split of the simple sugars fructose and glucose. Consequently, they are metabolized and digested by the body in virtually the same manner. Caroline Susie, RDN, LD, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, emphasized that "Our bodies aren’t going to know if that’s cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup. We just know that it is sugar and we need to break that down."

Experts further warn that excessive consumption of any refined sugar, whether cane sugar or HFCS, poses significant health risks. These include an increased likelihood of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and fatty liver disease. Susie concluded, "At the end of the day, it’s added sugar. Those added sugars really do add up."

Given these findings, a broader question arises: should one be drinking soda at all? While an occasional soda is generally deemed acceptable, regular consumption is not recommended by health professionals. Moskovitz pointed out that irrespective of the sweetener, "whether soda is sweetened with cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup, it’s still an empty-calorie, blood glucose-spiking beverage." Even diet soda, which contains no sugar or calories, is not a preferred option as it offers "zero nutrients." For optimal hydration, experts advocate for water as the gold standard, alongside unsweetened tea and sparkling water. For those craving a fizzy drink, Moskovitz suggests seltzer enhanced with a splash of juice or flavored with fresh fruits like berries, oranges, or limes.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

You may also like...