A recent announcement by President Donald Trump claimed that Coca-Colahad agreed to replace high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar in its regular Coke sold in the United States. While President Trump expressed enthusiasm for this purported "good move," the Associated Pressreported that Coca-Cola had not yet confirmed any such switch. This announcement, however, immediately sparked discussion and raised crucial questions among health experts and nutritionists regarding the actual health implications of such a change. Despite any perceived benefits, nutritionists have largely concurred that replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would not render the soda any healthier.

Currently, the standard American Coca-Cola is sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup, a liquid sweetener derived from cornstarch. This substance is categorized as a refined sugar, meaning it originates from natural sources but undergoes processing that strips away other nutrients, leaving behind pure sugar. Historically, Coca-Cola was indeed manufactured with cane sugar. However, the company transitioned to the more economical high-fructose corn syrup in the early 1980s. Interestingly, many other regions globally, including Mexico, continue to produce Coke using cane sugar, exemplified by the "Mexican Coke" sold in classic glass bottles in the U.S.

Photo Credit: Pinterest

The core of the expert consensus is that Coke sweetened with cane sugar offers no health advantage over its high-fructose corn syrup counterpart. Nutrition experts highlight the striking similarities between these two sweeteners. Cane sugar, sourced from sugarcane or sugar beets, is also a refined sugar. Lisa Moskovitz, RD, CDN, CEO of the NY Nutrition Group, explained that while cane sugar might carry a "natural" halo effect, this perception is misleading. Both sweeteners possess remarkably similar molecular structures, each containing an approximate 50/50 split of the simple sugars fructose and glucose. Consequently, they are digested by the human body in virtually the same manner.Caroline Susie, RDN, LD, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, emphasized, "Our bodies aren’t going to know if that’s cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup. We just know that it is sugar and we need to break that down."

Regardless of the specific refined sugar used, experts caution against excessive consumption. Susie further elaborated that consuming an abundance of any refined sugar can significantly elevate the risk of various health issues, including weight gain, the development of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and fatty liver disease. Her succinct warning underscores the cumulative effect: "At the end of the day, it’s added sugar... Those added sugars really do add up." This highlights that the fundamental problem lies not in the type of refined sugar, but in the quantity consumed.

Photo Credit: Pinterest

Given these nutritional insights, the broader question arises: should one be regularly drinking Coke at all? While an occasional soda may be acceptable, nutrition experts strongly advise against consistent consumption. Moskovitz unequivocally stated, "Whether soda is sweetened with cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup, it’s still an empty-calorie, blood glucose-spiking beverage." Even diet soda, which contains no sugar or calories, is not a recommended daily beverage, as Susie pointed out that "Soda—regular or diet—provides zero nutrients."

For optimal hydration and health, experts universally recommend water as the gold standard. Other beneficial alternatives suggested include unsweetened tea and sparkling water. For those who occasionally crave the effervescence and flavor of soda, Moskovitz offered a healthier substitute: seltzer enlivened with a splash of juice or flavored with fresh fruits such as berries, oranges, or limes. This approach allows for enjoyment without the detrimental effects of excessive refined sugar or artificial sweeteners found in traditional sodas.