The electric SUV market has become intensely competitive, evolving rapidly from a landscape once dominated by the Tesla Model Y. Today, numerous mainstream automakers offer contenders in the compact EV segment, which continues to grow despite existing challenges for electric vehicles. To help consumers navigate this expanded market, a comprehensive evaluation compared seven popular 2025 electric SUVs: the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Toyota bZ, Ford Mustang Mach-E, Chevrolet Equinox EV, and Volkswagen ID4. This "Big Test" assessed various critical aspects including performance, range, charging capabilities, handling, and overall value.

In terms of raw performance, power figures among the tested dual-motor, big-battery versions ranged from 320 horsepower for the Korean entries (Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6) to 397 horsepower for the Tesla Model Y. Torque figures spanned from 389 lb-ft (Tesla) to 500 lb-ft (Mach-E). Notably, the Chevrolet Equinox EV tested was a front-wheel-drive base model with 220 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque, a less powerful configuration compared to its all-wheel-drive variant, which offers 300 hp and 355 lb-ft.

Range anxiety and reliable charging infrastructure remain significant concerns for potential EV buyers. Testing in Tehachapi, California, highlighted these issues, with fast-charging stations being offline and the need for adapters to access both Tesla's NACS and legacy CCS ports during the industry's transition. A rigorous 70 mph Road-Trip Range test revealed the Kia EV6 as the leader, achieving 266 miles on a single charge, close to its EPA-rated 295 miles. The Chevrolet Equinox EV followed with 262 miles, while the Mustang Mach-E and Tesla Model Y tied at 252 miles. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 managed 234 miles, partly due to its larger 20-inch wheels. The Toyota bZ and Volkswagen ID4 were at the lower end with 222 and 208 miles, respectively. In fast-charging tests, the Kia EV6 again excelled, adding 160 miles in 15 minutes at a 350-kWh charger, followed by the Ioniq 5 (138 miles), Model Y (133 miles), Toyota bZ (115 miles), VW ID4 (103 miles), and finally the Mach-E and Equinox EV (95 and 94 miles).

Driving dynamics proved diverse among the vehicles despite similar power outputs. The Ford Mustang Mach-E was praised as the most fun to drive, offering a strong connection to its Mustang heritage with smooth torque delivery, good lateral grip, and confident body control. The Kia EV6 provided a sportier feel with tighter steering and a firmer suspension compared to its platform-mate, the Hyundai Ioniq 5, which was deemed the most comfortable, offering a placid ride. The refreshed Tesla Model Y showed significant improvement with a more settled and comfortable suspension, a marked change from previous stiff versions, complemented by quick and heavy steering. The Toyota bZ offered a good ride and ample power, but its loud tires and lack of a one-pedal driving option were noted drawbacks, similar to the Volkswagen ID4 which also lacked a one-pedal mode and offered only one brake regeneration setting, despite its praised sporty dynamics. The front-wheel-drive Chevrolet Equinox EV, though it rode well, struggled with torque steer and limited handling prowess against its all-wheel-drive competitors.

Interior design and features presented a mixed bag. All EVs offered roomy cabins. The Tesla Model Y impressed with its rear seats, featuring a dedicated screen for streaming, power-folding seats, a separate rear A/C zone, and the most legroom, though cost-cutting was evident with no sunroof cover and only one front USB port. The Hyundai Ioniq 5's cabin was lauded for its well-executed layout with a balanced mix of physical and digital controls. In contrast, the Kia EV6's switchable climate/audio control system was a source of frustration. The Mach-E's large vertical screen was simple but required drivers to glance down for temperature adjustments, though its redesigned center console improved practicality. The Toyota bZ suffered from an awkward driving position, with a small steering wheel potentially blocking the display. The Equinox EV's wide dual screens looked impressive, but the lack of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto was a significant disadvantage. The VW ID4 was criticized for lacking a volume knob and using capacitive slider controls, and its infotainment system, while improved, still lagged in responsiveness.

Value, encompassing price, features, materials, and overall quality, varied significantly. The Chevrolet Equinox EV, priced at $34,995, was the least expensive but also the most sparsely equipped, lacking AWD, dual-zone A/C, and premium seat features. Despite this, its 85-kWh battery and cabin size made it compelling compared to other sub-$40,000 EVs. The Kia EV6 ($56,435) offered stronger value than the more expensive Hyundai Ioniq 5 ($61,025), which, despite more equipment, struggled to justify its higher price. The Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium ($58,670) delivered strong value with premium features like a B&O sound system, 360-degree camera, heated/ventilated seats, and BlueCruise hands-free driving tech. Both the Mach-E and Model Y also featured usable frunks. The VW ID4's $59,870 price tag felt steep given its interior materials and lack of Supercharger access (a promised future fix). The Tesla Model Y, at $63,630 (including an $8,000 Full Self-Driving option), was the most expensive, with its value improving without the FSD option, though judges still noted cost-cutting in the cabin.

Safety, particularly Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), was a key differentiator. Ford's BlueCruise system on the Mach-E was highly effective, providing clear alerts and safely maintaining lane position and performing automatic lane changes. Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) demonstrated impressive capabilities on various roads but raised ethical concerns due to its beta status and occasional glitches like panic braking. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6's Highway Driving Assist II offered reliable smart cruise control and lane-following capabilities. Toyota's Safety Sense 3.0 and Volkswagen's IQ.Drive performed competently, though the ID4 sometimes drifted within its lane. The Chevrolet Equinox EV, without the optional Super Cruise, offered a more basic, less refined ADAS experience.

The "2025 EV Big Test" concluded with a tight race, showing that the Tesla Model Y, once the undisputed segment leader, now faces strong competition. The rankings were as follows: 1st Place: Ford Mustang Mach-E (praised for personality and driving dynamics). 2nd Place: Kia EV6 (impressive range and value, but criticized for controls). 3rd Place: Hyundai Ioniq 5 (outstanding styling, quick charging, but high price). 4th Place: Tesla Model Y (best tech, roomy, but FSD issues and cost-cutting). 5th Place: Chevrolet Equinox EV (great value, long range, but feature limitations). 6th Place: Toyota bZ (upgraded battery and power, but awkward seating and no one-pedal). 7th Place: Volkswagen ID4 (spacious, sporty, but high price, no one-pedal, and Supercharger access issues).

Beyond this comparative review, Tesla is also venturing into autonomous ride-hailing with its Model Y Robotaxi service, currently in beta testing in Austin, Texas. Based on a long-range, dual-motor 2026 Model Y Juniper, these Robotaxis feature "Project Halo" modifications, including a redundant communications unit for precise GPS and operator control. The service, operating with a safety monitor, is invitation-only and limited to specific geofenced areas and hours. Real-world tests revealed smooth acceleration and braking, minimizing "jerk," and the vehicles often exceeded speed limits by 5-7 mph on wider streets. However, significant glitches were observed, such as an inexplicable stop at a green light engaging ABS, waiting for a pedestrian beacon longer than legally required, and frequent issues with precise pickup/drop-off locations, often stopping away from the exact destination. Despite the modern and comfortable cabin, concerns were raised about the public safety implications of releasing "Full Self Driving Unsupervised" in its current state, especially regarding its cameras-only approach in adverse weather compared to Waymo's lidar and radar systems.

Adding to the Model Y lineup, Tesla has introduced the new Model Y Performance, a "bonkers fast" variant designed for enhanced acceleration and speed. This model features the latest ‘Performance 4DU’ drive units, delivering a total of 460bhp to all four wheels, enabling a 0-60mph time of 3.3 seconds and a top speed of 155mph. It boasts an upgraded battery pack with higher energy density and a WLTP range of 360 miles. Engineers have adapted the Model 3 Performance's adaptive suspension, tuning it for the larger Model Y, alongside new springs, roll bars, bushings, and structural improvements for increased torsional stiffness. Custom drive modes include an 'Insane' acceleration setting. Visually, the Performance model stands out with new front and rear bumpers that reduce drag and lift, a carbon fibre rear spoiler, red brake calipers, 'Performance' badges, and 21-inch ‘Arachnid 2.0’ forged wheels. Inside, it receives a bespoke 16-inch central touchscreen (up from 15.4 inches), special heated and ventilated Performance seats with added support, and real carbon fibre trim. Initially launching in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, with UK deliveries starting in September, it is priced at £61,990 in the UK, signifying its premium positioning within the Tesla lineup and its manufacturing at the Tesla Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg.