Osun Account Freeze Scandal: Tinubu Intervenes Amidst Political Firestorm

A major political storm erupted over the EFCC's freezing of an Osun State Government account just before the governorship election, drawing widespread condemnation and a N2 billion lawsuit from the state. President Bola Tinubu intervened, directing the EFCC to unfreeze the account, citing embarrassment over the timing and concerns about perceived federal interference.
Pelumi Ilesanmi
Pelumi IlesanmiLocal2 hours ago4 minute read
Osun Account Freeze Scandal: Tinubu Intervenes Amidst Political Firestorm

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) sparked a nationwide controversy by freezing an official account of the Osun State Government, specifically a statutory allocation account domiciled with First Bank, just days before the state’s governorship election slated for August 15, 2026. This action triggered widespread condemnations from various political figures and legal experts, leading to an eventual directive from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to unfreeze the account.

The EFCC, through its Director of Public Affairs, Wilson Uwujaren, staunchly defended its decision, clarifying that it placed only a temporary restriction on one specific account, not a blanket freeze on all state finances. Uwujaren stated that the commission had been investigating the Osun State Government since March 2026 over alleged fraudulent handling of Ecology Funds, Intervention Funds, and Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) allocations amounting to approximately N11 billion. He explained that the restriction was imposed after detecting suspicious transfers of funds to several corporate entities beginning on August 2, 2026. Citing Section 34 of the EFCC Act and Section 7(6) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2022, Uwujaren asserted the action was lawful, necessary to preserve public funds, and denied any political motivation despite the imminent election. He also revealed that the EFCC was investigating about 18 other states for similar financial infractions.

The Osun State Government, however, vehemently rejected the EFCC's allegations of N11 billion fraud, describing them as a “failed attempt to cover up illegal action through unfounded allegation.” The Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Oluomo Kolapo Alimi, insisted there were “no funds to loot in Osun State” and alleged the real reason for the freeze was a directive from former Governor and current Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Gboyega Oyetola, aimed at frustrating the payment of palliatives to workers. The government confirmed it had already paid the palliatives despite the freeze and accused the EFCC of pursuing a "hatchet job" for the Osun APC. Consequently, Governor Ademola Adeleke filed a N2 billion lawsuit against the EFCC, its Chairman, and First Bank Nigeria Limited, arguing the freeze was unlawful, unconstitutional, and executed without a valid court order, seeking damages and restoration of account access.

The EFCC's action drew sharp criticism from prominent political figures. Adewole Adebayo, the presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), called for President Tinubu’s resignation, not EFCC Chairman Ola Olukoyede's, asserting that “the buck stops” with the president. Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde accused the EFCC of using federal institutions to target opposition-controlled states and unduly influence the Osun governorship election, warning that such actions weaken public confidence in democratic institutions and exceed the EFCC's legal powers without due process. Peter Obi, the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) presidential candidate for 2027, expressed deep concern, cautioning against weaponizing anti-corruption efforts for political intimidation and highlighting the need for impartiality and adherence to due process. Demola Olarenwaju, Senior Political Assistant to the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, explicitly claimed President Tinubu was “the man behind the masquerade troubling Osun State,” suggesting the EFCC acted at Tinubu’s direction for political ends, inconsistent with democratic norms.

Adding a legal perspective, human rights lawyer Hamza N. Dantani accused the EFCC of engaging in selective investigations, which he believes threatens the rule of law and constitutional democracy. Dantani argued that the decision to impose a Post No Debit (PND) restriction without first obtaining a court order, especially at a politically sensitive time, raised serious constitutional and legal concerns. He cited judicial precedents that mandate court orders for freezing bank accounts and expressed concern over the public perception that the EFCC shows greater enthusiasm in investigating opposition-controlled states, undermining its neutrality and credibility. Dantani further criticized the EFCC's public statement for failing to address the central legal issue of lacking a prior court order, emphasizing that "the end never justifies the means" in a constitutional democracy.

Amid the growing outcry, President Bola Tinubu intervened, directing the EFCC to immediately approach the court to vacate the order freezing the Osun State Government's account and discontinue all related actions. He personally conveyed this decision to Governor Adeleke in a telephone conversation, which singer Davido publicly confirmed witnessing. President Tinubu expressed being “deeply embarrassed” by the timing of the EFCC’s action, acknowledging that while the commission acted under a valid court order and within its statutory powers, the proximity to the state’s governorship election could create an undesirable impression of federal interference in the poll. He reiterated his commitment to the independent operation of anti-corruption agencies but deemed the timing “inauspicious.”

This complex episode underscores the delicate balance between anti-corruption enforcement, political neutrality, and the preservation of democratic processes. It highlights ongoing tensions regarding the exercise of institutional powers, due process, and the potential for perceived political manipulation in Nigeria's governance landscape.

Loading...