Navigation

© Zeal News Africa

Duchess's Disconnect: Sarah Ferguson Faces Backlash Over Lavish Property Sale and Royal Housing Demands

Published 4 hours ago3 minute read
Precious Eseaye
Precious Eseaye
Duchess's Disconnect: Sarah Ferguson Faces Backlash Over Lavish Property Sale and Royal Housing Demands

Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, is reportedly facing significant distress, described as being "on the edge" with "nowhere to go," as a major scandal continues to cast a shadow over her family. She and her ex-husband, Prince Andrew, have recently been subjected to intense fresh scrutiny concerning their controversial relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Despite both having relinquished their royal titles earlier this month in response to the public backlash, the controversy and furore surrounding them appear far from over.

A critical point of contention revolves around their continued residence at the 30-room Royal Lodge in Windsor. The pressure for the former Duke and Duchess of York to vacate the property has reached an unprecedented high. However, reports suggest that they are adamantly refusing to move out unless they are compensated with two new royal properties. Prince Andrew legally secured the Royal Lodge with a 75-year lease from the Crown Estate in 2003, making it his property for the duration unless he chooses to leave voluntarily. This situation has reportedly been a long-standing issue, with King Charles having pushed for Andrew to move for years, yet Andrew has consistently resisted.

The financial details of Prince Andrew's lifestyle remain largely undisclosed, especially since he stepped down from his official duties and public life in November 2019. In contrast, Sarah Ferguson, who cohabits with him at Royal Lodge, has engaged in various public business ventures over the years, notably as an author. She recently sold a luxurious London townhouse in Belgravia, which she had acquired for £4.2 million in 2022. This sale, occurring just prior to the recent intensification of the scandals, resulted in her accepting £400,000 less than her purchase price, according to Land Registry documents. Her spokesperson clarified that she "wasn't looking to sell it," but when the tenant expressed interest in buying it this year, it "seemed like a good time to sell." The spokesperson added that it was an "investment property for her girls, and so the monies will be reinvested accordingly." However, other insiders cited by the Mail suggest that the proceeds from the house sale might have been intended to help finance Andrew and Sarah's ongoing expenses at Royal Lodge.

Royal expert Jennie Bond has strongly condemned the alleged demand for two new homes, asserting that it "beggars belief." Bond emphasized that "Andrew and Sarah are grown-ups with their own money and resources" and should be self-sufficient rather than relying on the King and the goodwill of the Crown Estate. She warned that it would be a "serious mistake if the King and the Palace agreed to such a brazen demand." Bond further questioned their awareness of public sentiment, highlighting the "genuine outrage" from the public and prominent Members of Parliament regarding their alleged dishonesty about their friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. She contrasted this public sentiment with their perceived entitlement to not just one, but two "magnificent homes in the extremely royal surroundings of Windsor Great Park, almost in the shadow of the Castle itself," labeling it an "audacious demand" that the Palace "should outright reject."

Conversely, a source closely associated with the former Duke and Duchess has refuted these reports, claiming that the offer was "misrepresentative of the truth" and had "been on the table for months," suggesting a more nuanced context to the public narrative.

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

You may also like...