From silicon to steel, we live in an age of invention- yet the world still defaults to war over well-being. In 2024, military spending reached $2.72 trillion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), based on data submitted to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). That same year, over 295 million people faced acute hunger, as reported by the World Food Programme (WFP).

The U.S., China, and Russia alone accounted for over 60% of global defense spending in 2024- totaling nearly $1.46 trillion, according to official estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, China’s Ministry of Finance, and Russia’s Ministry of Finance. These figures underscore a startling misalignment of priorities: while economies pour unprecedented sums into military build-ups, critical areas like hunger, education, and climate resilience are consistently underfunded. The opportunity costs are not just fiscal- but deeply human and generational.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance reported spending 26% of its GDP- nearly $140 million daily- on the ongoing war. The World Bank projects that rebuilding Ukraine will cost $524 billion, with GDP still over 20% below pre-war levels. In the Middle East, Israel’s defense budget rose 65% to $46.5 billion, while Iran spent $7.9 billion amid continued proxy tensions.

In April 2025, the White House approved $95 billion in supplemental U.S. defense funding, including $26 billion for Israel- further widening mistrust. Meanwhile, a UNDP–Oxfam report showed that redirecting just 2.9% of G7 defense budgets- roughly $35.7 billion- could eradicate global hunger. The WFP’s 2021 appeal for $5.5 billion to prevent famine would have required less than 26 hours of global military spending. Yet these trade-offs- between weapons and welfare- are rarely addressed in mainstream security discourse or legislative priorities.

In South Asia, the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025 led India to spend over ₹30,000 crore (~$3.6 billion) on emergency troop deployment (MEA Briefings). According to the Union Budget 2025–26, India’s total defense outlay stood at Rs. 6.8 lakh crore (~$82 billion)- roughly 13% of total expenditure, with significant allocations toward capital modernization. Pakistan mirrored these moves, reinforcing a reactive loop that sidelines lasting resolution.

Warfare itself is evolving with alarming speed. The U.S. Department of Defense plans to deploy 2,000 autonomous drones, invested $500 million into the Loyal Wingman program, and allocated over $3.3 billion to military AI development. These technologies promise speed and scale- but at the cost of human oversight and ethical clarity. The UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) warns that automation in warfare compresses decision loops and increases the risk of uncontrolled escalation.

According to USAFacts, the United States maintains over 243,000 military personnel abroad, including 177,000 active-duty troops. UN Peacekeeping reports China has 2,875 troops in UN missions- more than any other permanent Security Council member. Russia contributes only 87 such troops, but maintains sizable deployments in Belarus, Syria, and Africa. These positions extend strategic influence and often bypass global checks. The 1999 NATO Review recalled the “peace dividend” following Cold War disarmament. But even before World War II, the League of Nations collapsed under geopolitical strain- failing to stop rising militarism. Today, 22 of 31 NATO countries exceed 2% of GDP on defense. The New START Treaty is nearing expiration, and UNODA confirms all nine nuclear powers are modernizing arsenals.

Institutional reform is urgent. The UN Security Council remains imbalanced. Its five permanent members- especially the U.S., China, and Russia- continue expanding nuclear arsenals while urging others to show restraint. This contradiction undermines non-proliferation credibility. If global powers are sincere about peace, disarmament must start with them. Switzerland has shown that restraint can coexist with security. A June 2025 SIPRI report warned that NATO’s proposed 5% GDP defense benchmark could erode social investment across Europe. A UN Innovation Lab proposal suggests redirecting 5% of global defense spending (~$135 billion) toward PeaceTech: conflict mediation tools, digital ceasefire systems, and AI-powered diplomacy. The resources exist. What’s missing is the vision.

In Geneva, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said: “Peace is never automatic. Peace demands action- and peace demands leadership.” That leadership must transcend rivalry and reflect our shared humanity. For too long, global security has been framed as a zero-sum game- where one nation’s gain means another’s loss. But in a connected world, this thinking only breeds fragility.

India, drawing from its civilizational ethos and democratic tradition, can offer moral leadership- through dignity, dialogue, and non-alignment rooted in principle. Gandhi, Mandela, and King must guide us- not as saints, but as strategists for peace. Their call for inclusion and justice is not utopian- it is urgent. Let us reclaim peace- intentionally designed, compassionately led, and ultimately remembered not for conquest, but for care and cooperation.

.

Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the official position or policy of Financial Express Online. Reproducing this content without permission is prohibited.