In a move described by some as both overdue and critically necessary, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the suspension of Police Minister Senzo Mkhuu and the establishment of a comprehensive commission of inquiry. This commission is set to probe deep into the country's policing, judiciary, and intelligence spheres, highlighting the president's commitment to rooting out rampant corruption within the government. This decision comes amid growing public outcry and frustration over the perceived ineptitude in tackling corruption, particularly among top political figures. Azar Jamin, Director and Chief Economist at Econometrics, shared his insights during a recent interview, pointing out the palpable frustration across the nation. "The population is getting absolutely fed up with the corruption they see, especially involving top politicians and cabinet ministers," Jamin said. He noted that while some criticized Ramaphosa for not conducting a more extensive cabinet reshuffle, the suspension marked a necessary first step in addressing the dire issues plaguing South Africa. The announcement signals a crucial moment for South Africa, where economic growth has been stunted by criminal syndicates and systemic inefficiencies. Jamin emphasized the detrimental impact these issues have had on both domestic and foreign investment. Projects hampered by criminal activities have deterred capital investment, eroding economic advancement and service delivery improvements. Yet, skepticism persists among the populace, especially concerning the efficacy of commissions of inquiry. Many remember the Zondo Commission's limited outcomes in terms of prosecutions and convictions, despite uncovering significant evidence of malfeasance. "There is total frustration within the populace at the inability of the government seemingly determined to root out corruption and failing to do so," reiterated Jamin, underscoring the public's demand for tangible actions and results. Concerns also surround the choice of Professor Firoz Kachalia to temporarily fill the void left by Mkhuus’s suspension. Critics question the necessity of expanding authority amid an already bureaucratic structure, despite Kachalia's reputation for integrity. Jamin expressed cautious optimism, highlighting Kachalia as a person committed to transparency and accountability. The ramifications of these developments extend to the Grand National Unity (GNU) coalition, with political stability repeatedly questioned as Ramaphosa navigates pressures from allies and adversaries alike. Jamin asserted that while confidence in the GNU holding remains, largely due to the lack of an alternative, internal tensions persist. As political considerations take precedence, frustration may mount among GNU members who wish to see more decisive actions against corruption. The economic implications of these governance issues are being keenly felt. South Africa's GDP growth remains disappointingly low, compounded by ongoing educational deficits, insufficient business activity, and entrenched cadre deployment within government ranks. Overregulation continues to stifle private sector growth, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises. Despite these challenges, Jamin maintains a semblance of hope that the inquiry could represent an opportunity for South Africa to come to terms with its systemic issues. As the commission unfolds over the next few months, investors and citizens alike will be watching closely for signs of accountability and corrective action. For many, seeing key figures held accountable could mark a turning point in restoring trust in government institutions. As Azar Jamin aptly summarized, "People are getting totally fed up that those accused of corruption are not seeing any negative results from their actions." The nation stands at a crossroads, with the potential to either reinforce systemic failures or redefine its path toward sustainable growth and governance.