Navigating the process is one of the most time-consuming challenges healthcare providers face today. From verifying coverage to following up on approvals and denials, this process can easily become a bottleneck in your clinical operations. The good news? A well-defined workflow can help you streamline every step, reduce administrative burden, and get care to patients faster. In this guide, we’ll break down each stage of the process. For more background on how prior auth works in the broader healthcare system, visit ourwhat is prior authorization in healthcare article.

The first step in any prior authorization process is confirming that the service actually requires prior approval, and that the patient is covered for it.

This step typically includes:

Many practices miss this step or handle it inconsistently, which leads to downstream issues like submitting requests for non-covered services or wasting time collecting unnecessary documentation.

Using a checklist or centralized intake system can help standardize this phase across departments and improve first-time submission accuracy.

Once a prior authorization is deemed necessary, it’s time to gather and submit the required documentation. Insurers generally expect medical records to justify the medical necessity of the service being requested.

Common documents include:

Every insurer has its own list of requirements, which can make this part of the process especially complex. Missing or incorrect information is one of the top reasons for delays or denials.

Keep a resource bank of payer-specific templates and forms. Train your staff on what each insurer typically looks for and when to escalate for physician sign-off.

After submission, the waiting begins. Unfortunately, this is where many bottlenecks form – especially when insurer response times are inconsistent or unclear.

Insurers typically provide decisions within 24–72 hours for standard requests and even faster for urgent ones. However, some payers still rely on fax or manual systems, which can slow things down considerably.

Common communication delays include:

To manage this, build a follow-up calendar for all submissions. Designate a staff member to handle escalation calls and recheck statuses after 48–72 hours. And always keep records of correspondence and time stamps – these may come in handy during an appeal.

Once the insurer reviews the case, you’ll typically get one of three outcomes:

It’s important to track these decisions using a centralized dashboard or EHR integration so that authorizations are not misplaced or expire unnoticed.

Always document the decision letter or email, including the rationale for denial. If you receive verbal authorization, follow up with a written confirmation.

If a prior authorization is denied, the provider can appeal. The success of an appeal often depends on presenting additional clinical justification and correcting any documentation errors from the original submission.

Here’s a standard appeals workflow to follow:

Some tips for boosting your success rate:

Appeals take time but are worth the effort, especially for high-cost services or medications. They also serve as learning opportunities to improve your initial submission process moving forward.

A smooth process doesn’t happen by accident – it requires a clear workflow, trained staff, and proactive follow-up at every step. From initial eligibility checks to handling denials and appeals, every stage plays a critical role in speeding up care and protecting your revenue.

Here’s a quick recap of key actions to build into your workflow:

• Track submissions with timelines and reminders
• Document every outcome and response

Standardize the appeal process to avoid repeat mistakes