FBI, DEA Seek More Time For Tinubu's Probe Records Release
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) informed a U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Thursday that they require an additional 90 days to produce investigation reports related to an alleged drug case involving President Bola Tinubu from the 1990s.
The two U.S. federal agencies made this request in a Joint Status Report submitted to the court, along with the plaintiff in the case, Aaron Greenspan.
However, Greenspan, an American, rejected the proposal and instead suggested a 14-day extension for the FBI and DEA to produce the records.
The District Court, presided over by Judge Beryl Howell, had previously ordered the agencies, on April 8, 2025, to search for and process non-exempt records related to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted by Greenspan, with a report due on May 2, 2025.
Greenspan, the founder of the legal transparency platform PlainSite, had filed 12 FOIA requests between 2022 and 2023, seeking information on a Chicago drug ring that operated in the early 1990s.
His requests included records on Tinubu and three other individuals: Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Abegboyega Akande, and Abiodun Agbele.
Previously, the FBI and DEA had issued “Glomar responses” — a refusal to confirm or deny the existence of the requested records — but the court ruled that such responses were inappropriate in the instance.
In the Joint Status Report dated May 1, 2025, the FBI and DEA stated that they have begun their searches for responsive, non-exempt, reasonably segregable portions of the records requested by the plaintiff and anticipate completing their searches within 90 days.
On his part, Greenspan insisted that the agencies should produce unredacted versions of already-identified documents by next week, while the remaining records should be produced within 14 days.
He also argued that the defendants failed to provide any valid rationale for why the search for the documents would take 90 days.
Greenspan and two lawyers representing the defendants, Edwards Martin, Jr. and Jared Litman, signed the report.
The report reads: “Aaron Greenspan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the only remaining defendants in this case, respectfully submit the following joint status report proposing a schedule to govern further proceedings, pursuant to the Court’s Order of April 8, 2025 (ECF No. 47).
“Pursuant to the Court’s order, the defendants FBI and DEA must search for and produce non-exempt records responsive to the plaintiff’s FOIA requests (FBI Requests Nos. 1588244-000 and 1593615- 000, and DEA Request Nos. 22-00892-F and 24-00201-F).
“The FBI and DEA have initiated their searches for responsive, non-exempt, reasonably segregable portions of records requested by the plaintiff and anticipate completing their searches in ninety days.
“Given the years-long delay already caused by the defendants and the fact that many responsive documents have already been identified, the plaintiff proposes that the FBI and DEA complete their searches and productions by next week, or, at the very least, produce unredacted versions of the already-identified documents by next week, with the remainder completed in 14 days. The defendants provide no rationale for why their search for documents should take 90 days.
“The plaintiff intends to request reimbursement for his costs: the filing fee of $402.00 and $38.22 for certified mail postage, totalling $440.22.
“The defendants propose that the parties submit a joint status report on or before July 312025 to update the Court on the case status following the agencies’ search for responsive, non-exempt, reasonably segregable records requested by the plaintiff. The plaintiff proposes that they submit a joint status report on or before May 31, 2025.”
We’ve got the edge. Get real-time reports, breaking scoops, and exclusive angles delivered straight to your phone. Don’t settle for stale news. Join on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates →
Join Our WhatsApp ChannelYou may also like...
POLITICS:SHOULD POLITICIANS EARN THE MINIMUM WAGE?

What if your president earned the same as a teacher? This bold essay explores the growing divide between political elite...
Erased or Ignored? The Forgotten Female Heroes of African History”

Discover the untold stories of Africa’s forgotten female heroes—from warrior queens and resistance leaders to spiritual ...
Africa's Growth Paradox: Why Booming Economies Aren't Delivering Jobs for Its Youth Majority

Africa's GDP is rising, but youth unemployment persists. Uncover the disconnect between economic growth and job creation...
Emotional Blackmail in African Homes: Love, Guilt, and Obedience

Explore how emotional blackmail shapes relationships in African homes—where love is often tangled with guilt, obedience,...
SOCIAL INSIGHT: IS MARRIAGE STILL RELEVANT IN THE 21ST CENTURY?

Once seen as the ultimate milestone of adulthood, marriage is now being questioned, redefined, and reimagined. This essa...
Urban African Youth and the Rebirth of Cultural Identity

Urban African youth are redefining cultural identity through music, fashion, technology, and activism. From Kenya to Sou...
What Happens to African Girls Who Say No?
(3).jpeg)
Explore the struggles and resilience of African girls who dare to say no to forced marriage, gender-based violence, and ...
The African Dream Is Still to Leave Africa

For many young Africans, the dream isn’t to build Africa — it’s to leave it. This piece explores why the African Dream o...