ChatGPT vs. Claude AI Statistics - Which is Better? (2025)
In 2022, an American company developed a generative artificial intelligence chatbot named ChatGPT, based on large language models (LLMs). ChatGPT is now being adopted and integrated globally, including tools like Code Interpreter, DALL-E, and web browsers. In contrast, in the same year, Anthropic developed Claude AI, another type of chatbot that engages in natural language interaction. This focuses on safety, longer context handling, and a human-aligned design philosophy.
This article highlights key differences and compares the two AI systems, ChatGPT and Claude, covering overall market analysis, features, performance, user base, content handling, real-world use cases, pricing, and more All detailed below statistical analysis are taken from different sources, that will guide you in understanding the topic better.
AI model | ● GPT-4o ● GPT-4o mini ● o1 ● o1-mini ● O1 Pro | ● Claude Sonnet 4 ● Claude 3.5 Haiku ● Claude Opus 4 |
Type | ● Chatbot ● Large language model ● Generative pre-trained transformer | ● Artificial intelligence ● Large language model ● Chatbot |
Platform | Cloud computing platforms | Web browser, API |
Web search | Yes | |
Voice mode | Yes | |
Image generation | Yes | No |
Video generation | Yes (Sora) | No |
Computer use | Yes |
GPT-4o | Best for general purposes. |
GPT-4o mini | Fast and more affordable |
o1 | For complex tasks, they enable advanced reasoning |
o1-mini | Promotes faster reasoning |
o1 Pro | They are termed as the most powerful and resource-intensive. |
Claude Sonnet 4 | Most intelligent |
Claude 3.5 Haiku | Fast and most cost-effective |
Claude Opus 4 | For balancing complex tasks, they are powerful |
Country-wise user shares of ChatGPT:
Argentina | 5% | 7% | 5% |
Denmark | 9% | 8% | 3% |
France | 5% | 7% | 2% |
Japan | 4% | 5% | 1% |
United States | 4% | 11% | 7% |
United Kingdom | 6% | 7% | 2% |
(Source: backlinko.com)
(Reference: similarweb.com)
(Reference: similarweb.com)
Other countries’ usage share is detailed below:
India | 7.99% (+12.2%) |
Brazil | 5.4% (+22.35%) |
Republic of Korea | 3.94% (+31.77%) |
United Kingdom | 3.39% (+7.04%) |
The rest of the countries | 61.16% |
Other countries’ usage share is detailed below:
India | 8.41% (+0.79%) |
United Kingdom | 4.57% (-7.66%) |
Japan | 3.51% (-4.29%) |
Republic of Korea | 3.14% (-8.62%) |
Others | 52.32% |
Total Visits | 5.1 billion | 95.6 million |
Last Month Change | +13.04% | -5.41% |
Bounce Rate | 29.59% | 23.4% |
Pages per Visit | 4.15 | 4.02 |
Avg Visit Duration | 00:07:15 | 00:06:25 |
Three months’ Rank Change | 8 to 6 | 500 to 494. |
Global Rank | #6 | #494 |
Country Rank | #12 (United States) | #412 (United States) |
Category Ran | #1 | #19 |
Furthermore, other channels’ traffic shares are stated in the table below:
Referrals | 5.88% | 3.36% |
Organic Search | 14.41% | 18.68% |
Paid Search | 1.98% | 0.87% |
Social | 0.61% | 0.39% |
Media | 0.09% | 0.03% |
Display | 0.06% | 0.02% |
Platform Name | ClaudeAI | ||
YouTube | 61.05% | YouTube | 56.04% |
WhatsApp Webapp | 9.56% | WhatsApp Webapp | 10.66% |
| 8.52% | | 7.95% |
X-twitter | 4.17% | X-twitter | 6.25% |
| 3.16% | | 5.27% |
Others | 13.55% | others | 13.81% |
Pricings | ChatGPT | Claude AI |
Paid tier | ChatGPT Plus (USD 20/month ) | Claude Pro (USD 20/month) |
ChatGPT Pro (USD 200/month) | ||
Team plans | USD 30/user/month | |
API pricing | Claude 3.5 Haiku (USD 0.80/1M input tokens and USD 4/1M output tokens) | GPT-4o mini (USD 0.15/1M input tokens and USD 0.60/1M output tokens) |
Claude Sonnet 4 (USD 3/1M input tokens and USD 15/1M output tokens) | GPT-4o (USD 2.50/1M input tokens and USD 10/1M output tokens) | |
Claude Opus 4 (USD 15/1M input tokens and USD 75/1M output tokens ) | O1 (USD 15/1M input tokens and USD 60/1M output tokens ) | |
o1 mini (USD 3/1M input tokens and USD 12/1M output tokens) |
- According to the Writesonic blog, based on reasoning and knowledge tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet performed better than GPT-4 in tests such as MMLU, GPQA, and GSM8K, which assess general knowledge and math skills.
- The accuracy rate on the MMLU benchmark achieved 88.7% on ChatGPT-4.
- As per arxiv.org, ChatGPT-4o attained a 94.71% success rate in solving calculus differentiation problems, while the success rate of Claude Pro is 85.74%.
Conclusion
After completing the article on ChatGPT vs. Claude AI Statistics – Which is Better?, it is very clear that in 2025, the usage of ChatGPT is much more than ClaudeAI in many factors, which are elaborated above. In short, ChatGPT and its all models offer a versatile AI experience with capabilities spanning text, image, and video generation.
Whereas, ClaudeAI’s models demonstrated superior performance in complex tasks, including coding and logical reasoning. However, when it comes to choosing between ChatGPT and ClaudeAI, the decision ultimately depends on the user’s specific requirements.
Saisuman Revankar
Saisuman is a talented content writer with a keen interest in mobile tech, new gadgets, law, and science. She writes articles for websites and newsletters, conducting thorough research for medical professionals. Fluent in five languages, her love for reading and languages led her to a writing career. With a Master’s in Business Administration focusing on Human Resources, Saisuman has worked in HR and with a French international company. In her free time, she enjoys traveling and singing classical songs. At Coolest Gadgets, Saisuman reviews gadgets and analyzes their statistics, making complex information easy for readers to understand.