Google is facing renewed pressure from the U.S. Department of Justice, which is pushing for the tech giant to divest its Chrome browser as part of ongoing antitrust proceedings. The DOJ's stance, reaffirmed despite changes in administration, highlights concerns that Google's dominance in internet search has created an unfair marketplace. The department argues that Google's alleged anti-competitive practices harm consumers and businesses alike.

Google, however, contends that the proposed measures are excessive and would negatively impact American consumers, the economy, and national security. The company has proposed alternative solutions, including restructuring business contracts with mobile device manufacturers and wireless carriers. Google also plans to appeal the antitrust ruling.

At the heart of the DOJ's argument is the belief that divesting Chrome would allow rival search engines to compete more effectively. The government also proposes requiring Google to display a "choice screen" on its browser, allowing users to select their preferred default search engine. While the DOJ has dropped its demand for mandatory divestiture of Google's AI investments, the core issue of Chrome's dominance remains a key point of contention.

The legal battle stems from accusations that Google has used anti-competitive tactics to maintain its search dominance, including securing default search engine status on web browsers and smartphones. The DOJ claims this allows Google to manipulate auction systems and charge higher prices, ultimately harming consumers.

Google defends its position by arguing that consumers can easily switch search engines and that it faces competition from companies like Microsoft. However, the government points out that a significant portion of U.S. search queries originate from Google's default search engine, generating substantial profits for the company.

The DOJ's proposals include divesting Chrome, potentially targeting Google's Android launcher, and addressing Google's financial agreements with Apple, where Apple receives billions annually for making Google the default search engine on its Safari browser. These measures aim to level the playing field and prevent Google from leveraging its dominance in one area to gain an unfair advantage in others. The arguments from both sides are scheduled to be presented in court in April.