Soccer is claimed to be the most widespread sport in the world (Khaitovich, 2023; Kirkendall, 2020), with participants from both sexes and all skill levels participate in soccer, from children at grassroots levels, to adolescent players, to the highest levels among professional players, and to middle-aged and older adults (Temple and Crane, 2018; Zhang and Pitts, 2018). Thus, soccer has, arguably, the largest number of worldwide players out of all sports and soccer is therefore claimed to be deeply embedded in social contexts (Hyndman et al., 2024; Tovar, 2021). Not surprisingly, soccer is also the most studied research topic among all the sports in the world (Kirkendall, 2020; Sarmento et al., 2018).

The far most reported research topics in soccer research that historically have garnered most interest are topics related to injuries and illnesses (Krustrup and Parnell, 2019; Owoeye et al., 2020). Any injuries, knee injuries, ankle injuries, strain injuries, head injuries, hamstring injuries, and hip & groin injuries are topics that have garnered the most interest within injuries and illnesses (Kirkendall, 2020; Sanchez-Sanchez et al., 2024). Training and performance have also garnered interest among soccer researchers (Clemente et al., 2021; Nicholson et al., 2022). The work to investigate match performance has been of special interest, and how match performance is associated to the physical demands in soccer (Armendáriz et al., 2023; Julian et al., 2021). Physical demands such as strength, endurance, agility and anaerobic capacity have been of special interest (Thapa et al., 2022; van de Hoef et al., 2020). Thus, the most popular topics in soccer research are injury or injuries, training and performance, and sport physiology in general.

However, the key idea of soccer is the soccer game and the play-counter play between the two teams and their players, where both teams are trying to outplay the other team. Thus, besides the physical demands associated with soccer, the players are also continually challenged to make decisions in relation to own team players, the team players from the opponent team, and spaces that occurs and closes on the soccer field. The overall aim is to outplay the opponent team by scoring more goals than the opponent. Soccer games and soccer specific training sessions are therefore cognitively highly demanding because of the consistent shifting environment on the soccer field and decisions that need to be made by the players to outplay the opponent team. Thus, soccer games are mentally demanding, and the functions in the brain that regulate the dynamics of the players’ cognitions and actions are of decisive importance. These executive functions are a set of general-purpose control mechanisms that are linked to the pre-frontal cortex of the brain (Miyake and Friedman, 2012; Strauss et al., 2006). These executive functions in the brain can be closely connected to the concept of game intelligence in soccer.

Executive functions (EFs), comprising working memory: the capacity to hold and manipulate information in real time, inhibitory control: the ability to suppress impulsive responses and focus on relevant stimuli, cognitive flexibility: the ability to switch between tasks and adapt to new rules or situations, and planning: the ability to anticipate future scenarios and organize goal-directed behavior, are key cognitive processes that underpin complex decision-making and adaptive behaviors in sport contexts (Diamond, 2013; Heilmann et al., 2022). In elite soccer, planning supports players in devising strategic actions, predicting opponents’ behaviors, and coordinating movements with teammates, which are critical for optimal tactical executions during matches.

Game intelligence in soccer can be defined as the ability to perceive, interpret, and predict relevant patterns of play in highly dynamic environments, and to make rapid, adaptive decisions that optimize team performance (Roca et al., 2013; Teoldo et al., 2021). This concept encompasses not only executive functions (EFs), such as working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control, but also perceptual-cognitive skills, including pattern recognition, visual search behaviors, and anticipatory decision-making (Mann et al., 2007; Vestberg et al., 2012). According to Habekost et al. (2024), cognition in elite soccer relies on the dynamic interplay between attentional control, perceptual processing, and action planning, which together support players’ abilities to identify situational affordances and execute contextually appropriate actions. Thus, game intelligence can be understood as an integrated cognitive capacity where EFs regulate higher-order decision processes and enable players to “read the game” and anticipate opponent behavior.

This dual-process perspective highlights the importance of studying both domain-general executive functions and domain-specific perceptual-cognitive abilities when examining elite soccer performance. Recent research has further expanded this understanding by highlighting how executive functions interact with personality traits to shape the cognitive profiles of elite players. Bonetti et al. (2025) demonstrated that elite soccer players exhibit distinctive combinations of cognitive and personality characteristics, suggesting that psychological factors such as resilience, openness, and emotional stability may complement executive functions to support high-level performance. These findings indicate that game intelligence is likely not solely dependent on cognitive mechanisms, but also on stable personality dimensions that influence players’ decision-making and adaptability under pressure.

First, the game of soccer put high demands on the players attentional resources because of the constant shifting contextual environment on the soccer field (Vestberg et al., 2012). Attentional resources can be divided into updating, shifting, inhibition and perceptual anticipation (Miyake and Friedman, 2012). Updating is the ability to constantly monitor the soccer field and add and delete the content of working memory. Shifting is the ability soccer players need to be flexible and switch their attention between different tasks and mental sets. As an example, soccer players must use their attentional resources to handle the ball when they receive it and monitor different spaces in the field for teammates to pass the ball to in the next moment. Inhibition is the ability to override dominant or prepotent responses in the situation, as when a player is tempted to pass the ball to the first and most obvious movement of a teammate, and the best action is to pass the ball to a teammate who is not so visible for the opponent team. The player must be able to quickly adapt, change strategy and inhibit the dominant response. Perceptual anticipation is the ability to understand what will happen next, based on the information the player has in the present moment. Therefore, it is claimed that good soccer players have excellent spatial attention, can use their attention flexible to detect important information in the soccer field and read the game so they can predict what will happen in the play-counter play (Vestberg et al., 2012).

Thus, excellent soccer players are able to make optimal decisions based on the movements of teammates and opponents that are favorable in the play-counter play interaction against the opponent team. The ability to anticipate the play-counter play can be specified by the attentional-, perceptual- and cognitive processing that occurs when players make decisions and execute actions based on how they perceive the current situation on the soccer field (Jordet et al., 2020). The most important environmental information from the soccer field is perceived by the player and placed in the player’s working memory, and that information is processed and interpreted by a comparison with learned actions from similar situations stored in long time memory (Moen et al., 2018). An effective perceptual-cognitive process requires that the player has developed actions that are suitable in the situation that occurs on the soccer field (Appelbaum and Erickson, 2018; Mangine et al., 2014). Thus, attentional resources in combination with perceptual-cognitive skills are crucial for performances in dynamic sports such as soccer (Mann et al., 2007). The soccer player’s ability to execute effective actions in the play-counter play interaction is defined as game intelligence (Furley and Memmert, 2013).

In sum, game intelligence is closely associated with executive functions and refers to the ability to execute appropriate decisions and effective actions in the soccer game (Mann et al., 2019; Williams and Jackson, 2019). Interestingly, tactical skills such as perceptual-cognitive skills and game intelligence are in recent years claimed to be valid predictors of future success in soccer (Huijgen et al., 2014; Murr et al., 2018; Roca et al., 2018) and are therefore highlighted as especially important among coaches in talent identification (Larkin and O’Connor, 2017; Bergkamp et al., 2021; Roberts et al., 2019).

Studies have utilized various methods to measure game intelligence and executive functioning, including video-based decision-making tasks: These assessments present players with real or simulated game scenarios to evaluate their decision-making (Ward and Williams, 2003). In-game performance analysis: Observational studies assess players’ tactical awareness and decisions during actual games (Williams and Hodges, 2005). Simulation-based assessments: Recent advances in virtual reality (VR) have enabled more immersive tests of game intelligence, such as the use of 3D simulations to replicate complex in-game scenarios (Romeas et al., 2016). Systematic reviews have offered valuable insights into this intersection, synthesizing findings from empirical studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between game intelligence and executive functions (e.g., Brimmell et al., 2022; Furley et al., 2023; Kalén et al., 2021; Scharfen and Memmert, 2019; Zhao et al., 2022). However, research on game intelligence in soccer seems scarce, and the mental capacities associated to the play-interplay process in soccer need further exploration among researchers. Most studies have explored youth level players, and elite level players are understudied. The aim of the current study is to map and explore the extent, range and nature of the existing literature on game intelligence in soccer to identify research gaps and suggest a research agenda, based on the following research question: “What does research between 2000 and 2023 on adult elite level players reveals about the interrelationship between executive functions and game intelligence in soccer?”

This scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley’s (2005) six-step framework, aiming to map the existing empirical research on the relationship between executive functions (EFs) and game intelligence in adult elite soccer players. Given the exploratory stage of this research field and the diversity of study designs and conceptualizations involved, a scoping review methodology was deemed appropriate.

Studies were included if they investigated adult elite soccer players aged 18 years or older, competing at national or international top levels. To be eligible, studies needed to examine either executive functions—such as working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control and perceptual anticipation—or cognitive processes closely linked to executive functioning within the context of game intelligence. This included research on perceptual-cognitive skills like visual search behavior, anticipation, and tactical decision-making, which are understood to contribute to players’ situational awareness and adaptive performance in complex, dynamic environments. Furthermore, studies had to address aspects of game intelligence, which in this review is defined as the integrated use of executive functions, perceptual skills, and decision-making abilities that enable players to interpret, anticipate, and respond effectively to evolving patterns of play. Eligible studies were required to be empirical, peer-reviewed, and published in English between January 1st, 2000, and December 31st, 2023.

The inclusion of studies focusing on visual search behavior is justified by the understanding that attentional control and perceptual processing are fundamental components of executive functioning during soccer performance. These processes support core executive functions such as working memory updating, cognitive flexibility, inhibition and perceptual anticipation, which together enable players to manage complex tactical demands and effectively “read the game” (Mann et al., 2007). Similarly, studies focusing on injury prevention were included if they explored the role of executive functions in mitigating cognitive errors and attentional lapses that may influence both injury risk and game-related decision-making, as demonstrated by Scharfen and Memmert (2021a,b).

A comprehensive search was conducted in March 2022 across the databases Scopus, Web of Science, SportDiscus, PubMed, PsycInfo, and ERIC. The search strategy combined terms related to soccer, executive functions, and game intelligence, and the complete search string is presented in Table 1. Following the removal of duplicates, two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, after which full-text screening was conducted based on the defined inclusion criteria. The initial search yielded 958 records, of which 12 studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review. Through backward citation tracking and snowballing, an additional three studies were identified, resulting in a total of 15 studies included in the review.

First, the research question was defined. The search strategy was designed to find studies primarily discussing football players’ game intelligence in elite football. We used a modified versin of a PICO framework as aid in designing a suitable research question which formed the basis for the review protocol, the search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction. In the next steps, relevant studies were identified, selected and charted. The scoping process is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1 illustrates the methodological identification and screening process of selecting relevant articles for the scoping review. The keywords for our search in databases were based on previous studies on the phenomena and consultations with experts in the field. Based on the research question, different synonyms for soccer and game intelligence emerged. These keywords constituted the basis for scoping the field of relevant studies. Table 1 presents how the search terms were combined into a search string using the Boolean operators AND and OR. The database search conducted March 2022 in Scopus, Web of Science, SportDiscus, PubMed, PsycInfo, Eric, Education source resulted in 958 articles that were transferred to the bibliographic software EndNote.

The process started with delineating the search to studies written in English that were published between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2023. To ensure methodological quality, only peer-reviewed studies were included.

After importing the references in EndNote and removal of duplicates, the search identified 958 references, which could be potentially relevant. The first and second author independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by a full text screening to determine eligibility. First, results that were not published between 2000 and 2023, not in English, or not peer-reviewed, were excluded. Second, studies not related to executive functions or adult elite players were removed.

In total, 12 studies focused on game intelligence among adult elite level soccer players. To identify potential studies not included or potentially missed in the database search we snowballed and hand searched for relevant studies in previous reviews and in the articles selected for this scoping review, this resulted in three additional studies, and a total of 15 studies were included in the review.

A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria for further analysis (see Table 2).

To synthesize the findings from the included studies, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) as outlined by Braun et al. (2023). This approach was selected due to its flexibility in identifying patterns of meaning across heterogeneous studies and its suitability for scoping reviews. The analysis followed a six-phase iterative process, starting with familiarization with the data through repeated readings of the included articles. Initial codes were generated based on the studies’ aims, methods, and key findings related to executive functions and game intelligence. These codes were then organized into candidate themes through an inductive process, allowing for the identification of recurrent patterns without imposing predefined categories.

Themes were refined through constant comparison, discussion among the authors, and critical reflection on our interpretations, ensuring that the thematic structure accurately represented the diversity of the included studies. The final thematic framework consists of seven overarching themes, which are presented in the results section: developmental trajectories of executive functions, the relationship between EFs and soccer performance, position-specific cognitive skills, perceptual-cognitive interventions, visual search behavior and anticipation, the role of EFs in injury prevention, and neuropsychological assessment of executive functions.

By applying reflexive thematic analysis, we aimed to provide a nuanced synthesis that accommodates the methodological diversity of the literature while highlighting the central cognitive processes that underpin game intelligence in elite soccer.

This scoping review included 15 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2000 and 2023, all exploring the relationship between executive functions (EFs) and game intelligence in adult elite soccer players. The included studies show considerable methodological diversity, both in their theoretical frameworks and their approaches to assessing cognitive processes, making synthesis complex but necessary for understanding common patterns and knowledge gaps. While some studies focus on general cognitive capacities measured through standard neuropsychological tasks, others adopt soccer-specific assessments, such as video-based decision-making or perceptual training interventions. Despite this heterogeneity, seven key thematic areas emerged from the analysis: developmental trajectories of executive functions, the relationship between EFs and soccer performance, position-specific cognitive skills, perceptual-cognitive training interventions, visual search behavior and anticipation, the role of EFs in injury prevention, and neuropsychological assessment of executive functions. Below, findings are presented across these themes, with attention to methodological strengths and weaknesses, recurring tendencies, and areas of divergence.

A recurrent topic in the literature concerns how executive functions develop in elite soccer players over time. Several studies suggest that EFs follow a curvilinear development, with accelerated growth during adolescence and a tendency toward stabilization in early adulthood (Beavan et al., 2020; Verburgh et al., 2014). Beavan et al. (2020) found that the most significant improvements in cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control occurred between ages 12 and 20. Beyond this period, gains appeared to level off, possibly reflecting the attainment of a cognitive ceiling related to natural maturation processes and the limits of neuroplasticity in adulthood.

Importantly, these insights are drawn primarily from cross-sectional studies, which limits the ability to draw causal conclusions or track within-individual changes over time. Furthermore, the age categories used in different studies vary, which makes comparison difficult. While some researchers interpret these findings to mean that soccer may selectively attract individuals with naturally higher EF capacities, others propose that prolonged exposure to the cognitive demands of elite soccer environments may help preserve high EF functioning during adulthood (Verburgh et al., 2014).

The field would benefit greatly from longitudinal studies that follow cohorts of players through key developmental windows, allowing researchers to distinguish between maturation effects, training effects, and selection biases. Such studies could clarify whether elite soccer environments contribute to the maintenance or even enhancement of EFs beyond typical developmental trajectories.

Across the literature, EFs emerge as critical cognitive resources for successful soccer performance. Cognitive flexibility, working memory, inhibitory control and perceptual anticipation are particularly highlighted as core mechanisms underpinning in-game decision-making and adaptive tactical behavior (Vestberg et al., 2012; Sakamoto et al., 2018). Players with higher EF capacities consistently demonstrate superior abilities to adjust strategies during dynamic match situations, manage multiple streams of information simultaneously, and suppress irrelevant stimuli to focus on the most critical aspects of play.

Vestberg et al. (2012), for example, linked higher EFs test scores to superior tactical adaptability and successful match outcomes, providing empirical support for the theoretical claim that EFs are foundational to handling the inherent unpredictability of elite-level soccer. However, other studies point to significant limitations, particularly concerning the ecological validity of EFs assessments. Laboratory-based tasks may not fully capture the contextual complexity of match play, where cognitive demands arise in tandem with physical exertion, emotional pressure, and interpersonal coordination.

Another limitation lies in the frequent disconnection between cognitive assessments and objective performance metrics. Few studies integrate EFs testing with granular performance data from matches, such as pass completion rates, defensive actions, or goal contributions. Without such links, the precise influence of EFs on measurable performance outcomes remains difficult to establish. To strengthen this field, future studies should aim to combine cognitive testing with advanced match analytics to better understand how EFs translate into concrete behaviors on the field.

A smaller subset of studies explores the potential differences in EFs demands across playing positions. Research suggests that offensive players, particularly midfielders and forwards, tend to score higher on measures of cognitive flexibility and attentional control than defensive players (Huijgen et al., 2015). This finding aligns with the higher levels of unpredictability, rapid transition, and creativity required in attacking roles, where players must generate and execute complex strategies under tight time constraints.

Conversely, defensive players appear to rely more heavily on anticipatory skills, pattern recognition, and positional discipline. These skills are crucial for reading the game, predicting opponents’ moves, and making preemptive interventions. However, evidence supporting these position-based cognitive profiles is currently limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent classification of playing positions across studies. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether cognitive differences drive players into specific positions or whether the cognitive demands of those positions shape players’ abilities over time.

Clarifying these relationships will require more rigorous and standardized research designs, possibly including longitudinal studies that follow players as they transition across positions or levels of competition. Such work could offer valuable insights into whether cognitive specialization is a product of role adaptation or selection based on inherent cognitive strengths.

Research on perceptual-cognitive interventions provides promising, albeit preliminary, evidence that cognitive aspects of soccer performance can be enhanced through targeted training. Several studies investigated programs using video-based tactical scenarios, virtual reality simulations, and computer-based decision tasks, reporting improvements in players’ anticipatory skills, decision-making speed, and tactical awareness (Romeas et al., 2016).

Despite these encouraging findings, significant limitations exist. Most intervention studies are short-term, lack robust control groups, and involve small sample sizes. Moreover, very few studies track whether cognitive gains persist over time or translate into improved match performance. This gap is critical, as the goal of such interventions is not just improved test performance but tangible enhancements on the field.

Future research should focus on longitudinal intervention designs with larger participant groups and rigorous control conditions. Additionally, there is a need for more sophisticated outcome measures that combine cognitive testing with objective, in-game performance analytics, providing a fuller picture of how cognitive training impacts real-world soccer performance.

Visual search behavior has emerged as a vital component of game intelligence, particularly in high-level soccer contexts where players must process complex visual environments rapidly. Studies consistently show that elite players use more efficient gaze patterns, focusing on relevant cues while filtering out extraneous information (Mann et al., 2007). This skill allows them to anticipate opponents’ movements, identify emerging tactical opportunities, and make proactive decisions under time pressure.

While visual search behavior is inherently linked to attentional control and working memory, its integration into broader models of executive functioning remains underdeveloped. Most studies treat visual search as a perceptual skill rather than exploring its interaction with higher-order cognitive processes. Future research could profitably investigate how visual search behaviors are supported by, and interact with, domain-general EFs, thereby contributing to a more unified model of cognitive-perceptual expertise in soccer.

An emerging but underexplored theme in the literature concerns the role of EFs in injury prevention. Some evidence suggests that stronger executive control may help players maintain attentional focus and avoid risky movements that increase injury likelihood (Scharfen and Memmert, 2021a,b). Cognitive overload, lapses in concentration, and diminished inhibitory control during fatigue or high-stress situations are hypothesized to contribute to injury risk, making EFs not only performance-enhancing but also health-preserving capacities.

Research in this area remains in its infancy. Few studies have directly measured EFs in relation to injury rates, and longitudinal research is especially lacking. Expanding this field could yield important insights into cognitive risk factors for injury and inform prevention strategies that integrate physical and cognitive training.

Among the included studies, a subset (e.g., Vestberg et al., 2012; Verburgh et al., 2014) relied on standardized neuropsychological tests to assess executive functions in controlled laboratory environments. These studies primarily measured working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and planning using established cognitive tasks such as the Stroop test, Trail Making Test, and digit span tasks. While these methods provide robust and replicable assessments of domain-general executive capacities, they may lack ecological validity, as they do not fully capture the dynamic and context-specific cognitive demands of real-game situations. However, such measures remain essential for isolating core cognitive functions and establishing baseline profiles of elite players’ cognitive abilities.

The relationship between game intelligence and executive functions in soccer is an emerging field of inquiry, but findings from this review show that research on this topic remains surprisingly limited. One plausible explanation for this scarcity lies in the highly competitive and lucrative nature of the soccer industry. With top clubs operating in a billion-dollar ecosystem, proprietary knowledge on the assessment, interpretation, and training of game intelligence and executive functions is often viewed as a strategic advantage. As a result, clubs may refrain from sharing data, methods, or findings that could undermine their competitive edge.

The soccer industry operates in a highly commercialized environment, where winning matches and tournaments significantly impacts revenue streams from sponsorships, broadcasting rights, and merchandise sales. In this context, intellectual property related to player performance becomes a valuable asset. Top clubs often employ in-house research teams and cutting-edge technologies, such as wearable sensors and neurocognitive assessments, to analyze players’ cognitive and physical attributes. This creates a wealth of data that remains inaccessible to external researchers. Research collaborations between clubs and academic institutions are rare, as clubs are reluctant to disclose insights that could benefit their competitors. Clubs increasingly use private databases and machine learning algorithms to predict player performance, creating barriers for independent validation or replication of results.

Moreover, the recent findings by Bonetti et al. (2025) suggest that understanding game intelligence in elite soccer may require a broader perspective that includes personality profiling alongside cognitive assessment. By identifying consistent psychological traits among elite players, this research highlights the potential for integrated player development models that encompass both cognitive training and psychological skill development. Future studies should therefore consider multimodal approaches that evaluate how personality factors interact with executive functions to shape on-field behaviors and decision-making processes.

Additionally, planning, as a higher-order executive function, may serve as a bridge between cognitive abilities and strategic behavior on the field. The inclusion of planning in cognitive profiling could help explain how players not only adapt to immediate changes but also anticipate and structure play sequences over longer time frames, contributing to what is often described as tactical foresight in soccer. Given the strategic nature of high-level competition, future research should explicitly assess planning abilities in relation to game intelligence and explore how they interact with personality traits identified by Bonetti et al. (2025).

In this context, neuropsychological testing in controlled environments becomes an invaluable tool, as it allows researchers to bypass data restrictions while still capturing critical aspects of executive functioning. However, while neuropsychological measures contribute unique insights into the cognitive profiles of elite players, they must be understood as complementary to soccer-specific assessments, which better reflect the real-time, high-pressure decision-making that defines game intelligence. Future research should seek to integrate these approaches to overcome the limitations imposed by restricted access to in-game cognitive data.

Academic researchers often face challenges in accessing high-quality data and funding to conduct longitudinal studies on game intelligence and executive functions. This limitation is exacerbated by the lack of cooperation from professional clubs, which are key stakeholders in the field. Researchers have restricted access to elite players. Most studies rely on convenience samples, such as amateur or youth players, which may not accurately represent the cognitive demands of elite soccer. There may be a conflict of interest. Clubs that collaborate with researchers may impose restrictions on publishing findings, as highlighted by Vestberg et al. (2020), thereby limiting the broader applicability of results.

Our methodological choices have led to limitations in the review process. Examples of choices that may have impacted the quality of the study is the selected databases and use of synonyms in the search string. These limitations may have been remedied by developing a transparent review protocol as used in traditional systematic reviews. Furthermore, a scoping review does not include a quality assessment of the reviewed studies, and it would have been interesting to view the included studies in light of quality assessment tools (Hong et al., 2018; Kmet et al., 2004).

A key challenge in this field is the lack of standardized tools for assessing both EFs and game intelligence. While some studies use neuropsychological tests, others rely on subjective evaluations, leading to inconsistent findings. Future research should focus on developing unified metrics to facilitate cross-study comparisons. In addition, the 12 included studies each provide unique perspectives on the interrelationship EFs and game intelligence in football. This complexity made it challenging to synthesize and compare the studies. Future studies should use more longitudinal designs to make it possible to examine relationships between the variables over time. Most studies to date are cross-sectional, limiting the ability to infer causal relationships between EFs and game intelligence. Longitudinal studies, such as those tracking players over multiple seasons, are needed to establish developmental trajectories. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are indispensable for studying the relationship between EFs and game intelligence in football because they establish causal links, control bias, and ensure robust and valid findings. By leveraging RCT designs, researchers can develop evidence-based cognitive training interventions that enhance both EFs and game intelligence, ultimately improving performance on the field.

Research demonstrates that cognitive flexibility and working memory are strongly associated with tactical decision-making and adaptability in elite players (Vestberg et al., 2012; Radke et al., 2023). Training programs should integrate EFs exercises alongside technical and physical drills. This could be exercises like dual task drills: a combination of cognitive challenge with physical activities such as dribbling while solving pattern-recognition puzzles, position-specific training: tailor drills to match positional demands (e.g., defenders focusing on anticipatory skills, attackers on rapid decision-making), or video-based decision training: use match scenarios to enhance players’ ability to process dynamic game information.

Furthermore, studies like Krupitzer et al. (2022) highlight the efficacy of VR-based training in improving cognitive skills. Such tools simulate realistic, high-pressure scenarios, allowing players to practice decision-making without physical strain. VR platforms like CortexVR in training sessions could enhance game intelligence in a controlled environment. Also the use of eye-tracking systems to assess and train visual search behaviors seems to be beneficial for developing game intelligence, particularly for goalkeepers and defenders.

Team performance relies on the interplay of individual players’ EFs, as evidenced by Scharfen and Memmert (2021a,b). Better cognitive flexibility can enhance coordination during complex tactical movements, such as pressing or counter-attacking. Based on this, a practical implications may be to introduce team-based cognitive challenges to foster synchronization and train players to anticipate teammates’ decisions based on contextual cues. In addition, injury prevention strategies should incorporate EF training, as lapses in cognitive attention are linked to injury risks (Scharfen and Memmert, 2021a,b). Coaches should design drills that replicate high-stress match scenarios, emphasizing cognitive focus under fatigue and monitor EFs metrics as part of injury risk assessments in elite players.

The interplay between EFs and game intelligence is pivotal for success at the elite level of soccer. Practical applications, such as integrating EFs training into development programs and using advanced technologies like VR, offer promising ways to enhance performance. However, substantial gaps in knowledge remain, particularly regarding position-specific demands, the impact of cognitive load, and longitudinal EFs development. Future research must address these gaps through well-designed, longitudinal, and comparative studies. By deepening the understanding of how EFs shape game intelligence, researchers can help coaches, players, and practitioners optimize training and maximize elite performance.

This scoping review provides a systematic synthesis of empirical research on the relationship between executive functions (EFs) and game intelligence in adult elite soccer players. The review highlights that core EFs—working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, perceptual anticipation and planning—are consistently linked to players’ capacity to process complex game situations, make rapid and adaptive decisions, and execute effective tactical behaviors under pressure. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that these cognitive processes may vary according to playing position, with offensive roles often demanding higher cognitive flexibility and attentional control, while defensive roles may prioritize anticipatory skills and pattern recognition.

The findings reveal that neuropsychological assessments remain essential tools in identifying individual cognitive profiles, despite challenges related to ecological validity and restricted access to in-game performance data due to commercial interests within elite football. Recent research, such as Bonetti et al. (2025), further expands the understanding of player performance by demonstrating how personality traits interact with cognitive abilities, suggesting that game intelligence emerges not solely from executive control but also from stable psychological characteristics that influence decision-making under stress.

However, the current literature is marked by methodological heterogeneity, with significant variations in how both EFs and game intelligence are conceptualized and measured. The dominance of cross-sectional designs and small sample sizes limits the ability to draw causal inferences or track the development of cognitive skills over time. Additionally, few studies have directly linked cognitive assessments to objective match performance metrics, leaving gaps in our understanding of how EFs translate into concrete actions on the field.

Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs, integrate neuropsychological and soccer-specific cognitive measures, and explore how cognitive training interventions might enhance both EFs and on-field performance. Moreover, combining cognitive profiling with personality assessments could provide a more holistic understanding of what distinguishes elite players, supporting more tailored approaches to player development and performance optimization.

By consolidating current knowledge and identifying critical gaps, this review contributes to the growing recognition of cognitive and psychological processes as fundamental components of expertise in elite soccer, while underscoring the need for more comprehensive, interdisciplinary research in this emerging field.

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

JH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HK: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. FM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Previous authors of studies and the participating athletes’ participation is deeply appreciated.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.