The provided text highlights a critical issue in political dynamics: the pervasive and often detrimental practice of unquestioning loyalty towards leaders. Through a satirical opening dialogue, the author, Chanda Chisala, immediately sets the stage, illustrating how supporters' automatic affirmation, regardless of a president's inconsistent or contradictory statements, leads to a dangerous disconnect from reality. This blind praise, while seemingly supportive, ultimately serves to harm the beloved leader, feeding them a distorted perception of their actions' efficacy and public reception. It fosters a perilous state akin to an "emperor walking around with no clothes," where the leader is lauded for non-existent virtues, leading to self-delusion and, ironically, a loss of respect for their own servile followers.

A vivid historical example from Zambian politics underscores this point, recalling President Chiluba's unexpected choice of Levy Mwanawasa as his successor, much to the chagrin of his previously unwavering MMD loyalists. These faithful supporters had consistently lauded every decision, even Chiluba's ill-advised attempt at a third term. Yet, when it came to the succession, Chiluba bypassed those who had offered undying, unquestioning support, opting instead for Mwanawasa. Mwanawasa had famously resigned as Vice President, openly disagreeing with Chiluba's handling of corruption allegations among his ministers. This act of defiance, while initially angering Chiluba, paradoxically earned Mwanawasa greater respect. It demonstrated a deeper loyalty to principles over blind allegiance to a person, showcasing a strength of character that Chiluba valued. When the time came to choose a successor, many individuals Chiluba had come to respect had already departed the party, leading him to summon Mwanawasa, recognizing his integrity.

The narrative further reveals how this dynamic extended to Michael Sata. Sata's strong disagreement with Chiluba's choice of Mwanawasa was, remarkably, his first notable opposition to a presidential decision. Chiluba, who had never anticipated such defiance from Sata, was shocked. This moment, however, proved pivotal for Sata, revealing his inherent leadership potential. As President Mwanawasa later turned against Chiluba, the former president found himself aligning with Sata and his opposition Patriotic Front. Had Sata not finally articulated his true feelings about a decision, breaking free from the mold of a "loyal pretender" within the MMD, he might never have actualized his own formidable leadership capabilities.

The core message is clear: while enthusiastic support and defense of one's preferred president are perfectly acceptable, there are crucial moments when integrity demands honest feedback. When a follower genuinely believes a leader is mistaken or misguided, voicing that concern is not only a duty to one's own principles but also essential for the weight and credibility of any future statements of support. The most destructive path is to stifle critical thought, automatically defending decisions that are disturbing or confusing. Such behavior merely propels the leader deeper into a "ditch of self-delusion" and, more profoundly, betrays one's own mind and soul, an act of "treason against reason." True support is nuanced, grounded in independent thought and a commitment to truth, rather than an unthinking, automatic endorsement of every action.