Log In

Amazon Held Accountable for Dangerous Products

Published 1 month ago6 minute read

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has ruled that Amazon must recall dangerous products sold on the platform, even if they are sold by third parties.

The regulator’s final decision, released last month, comes after a July 2024 ruling that classifies the e-commerce giant as a distributor under the Consumer Product Safety Act. As a distributor, Amazon bears a legal responsibility for recalling dangerous products and informing customers of those dangers.

An Amazon Prime package delivered on a doorstep.

That ruling stemmed from a lawsuit the CPSC filed against Amazon in 2021 over thousands of products it found unsafe. The products included children’s pajamas that failed to meet federal flammability standards, hair dryers that didn’t protect against electrocution in water, and faulty carbon monoxide detectors. More than 400,000 of the items were sold between 2018 and 2021.

Amazon’s “Fulfilled by Amazon” (FBA) program allows third-party sellers to list products on the site and store them at Amazon fulfillment centers. Amazon processes their payments, ships their orders, and facilitates customer service inquiries. 

FBA sellers account for more than 60 percent of Amazon’s sales, which reached nearly $575 billion in 2023.

Most of the products deemed unsafe by the CPSC were made by small, foreign sellers who only used Amazon to sell their products because of how easy it was. Merchants can set up shop with little oversight.

Amazon actively recruits Chinese sellers, for example, to ensure that competing online marketplaces cannot offer as many products. But those goods don’t always meet U.S. safety standards. Companies whose products injure customers are outside U.S. jurisdiction and can simply disappear from Amazon.

After the CPSC alerted Amazon to the defective products, the company stopped selling them and offered customer refunds, but refused to collaborate on a safety recall.

In response to the CPSC lawsuit, Amazon argued that it was not liable for unsafe products because it acted simply as a “third-party logistics provider” for its FBA sellers.

However, the administrative law judge who issued last year’s ruling found that Amazon’s role in the FBA program qualified it as a distributor.

The CPSC said that Amazon’s customer notices sent in 2021 “downplayed the severity” of the dangers, only warning that products “may fail” to meet federal safety standards and only “potentially” posed risks.

Distributors are typically required to use the word “recall” in such notices; Amazon did not, choosing less alarming subject lines such as “Important safety notice about your past Amazon order.” The notices also did not include pictures of the affected items, a step required by law.

Amazon also put the onus on customers to destroy the products but didn’t require proof before sending a gift card. The company provided no way for customers to respond and, said the CPSC, “made no effort” to ensure each message had even been opened. 

Amazon must now email any affected customers and post recall notices in their order history, incentivize them to destroy or dispose of the product, keep recall notices online for at least five years, and submit monthly progress reports to the CPSC.

Consumer advocates praised the CPSC’s decision.

“This order is about making sure Amazon is just as accountable as every other company that sells products to consumers who often think that if something is for sale, it must be safe,” said Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog director at U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

Consumers injured by dangerous or defective products can recover compensation by filing a product liability lawsuit. Such litigation can also encourage manufacturers to strengthen safety standards.

Products that are improperly manufactured, negligently designed, or on the market despite known dangers are grounds for a product liability lawsuit.

retail shelves with stanley quencher h2.0 tumblers and a sign limiting amounts available for purchase

The stainless steel water bottles known as Stanley cups, which became a nationwide obsession after going viral on social media, are under fire in several federal class action lawsuits for containing lead, which plaintiffs say the parent company, Seattle-based Pacific Market International, LLC (PMI), failed…

alaska airlines boeing 737 in flight against blue skies

Plane passengers are filing lawsuits against Boeing and Alaska Airlines after an incident last month that they say caused emotional distress. On Jan. 5, a Boeing 737 MAX 9 door plug blew out in the middle of an Alaska Airlines flight 16,000 feet above ground,…

3M headquarters in Saint Paul, MN, USA

Hundreds of thousands of earplug lawsuits have been filed against global manufacturing giant 3M over their Combat Arms earplugs, alleging that a design flaw caused hearing damage or loss in countless active duty troops and veterans in Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2019, the cases were…

3M Indianapolis is a Personal Safety Division facility that manufactures varieties of hearing protection.

A federal judge has barred 3M from using a liability strategy that would’ve shifted 3M earplug lawsuits to one of its subsidiaries. 3M has already had to pay more than $300 million in awards after 16 bellwether test trials. The plaintiffs claim that 3M knowingly…

3M company logo on headquarters building

On Friday, August 26, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey J. Graham denied Aearo Technologies’ efforts to temporarily halt 3M earplug lawsuits while Aearo pursues Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Judge Graham said that since 3M hasn’t filed for bankruptcy, the lawsuits will continue forward in multidistrict litigation (MDL).…

3M Signage Logo Top of Glass Building

Those serving this country in the military put themselves in harm’s way. Their commitment and dedication to our nation are heroic. However, what most soldiers don’t expect is to be injured by a product that was supposed to protect them while serving. Such is the…

fire extinguishing with foam

Firefighters have among the most dangerous jobs on the planet; from running into burning homes to spending weeks in the field battling forest fires, they risk their lives to keep us safe when every second counts. It’s reasonable to expect that the gear they use…

human ear closeup macro shot

Military service members already put their lives on the line every day, knowing they may be killed in service to their country. Serious injuries are common in the field, affecting one in ten veterans alive today. But according to the Department of Veterans Affairs, hearing…

firefighter spraying foam to extinguish a fire

For decades, a synthetic foam concentrate has been a crucial tool for firefighters fighting blazes caused by flammable liquids. But the chemicals in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) that make it so effective have been linked to severe illnesses like cancer, thyroid disease, and kidney and…

Close up of 3M sign with tree and blue sky in background.

A federal jury awarded $110 million in damages to two U.S. Army veterans last month in response to lawsuits alleging that manufacturing company 3M knowingly marketed defective earplugs that caused hearing loss. The company plans to appeal the decision. Military members are more susceptible to…

Origin:
publisher logo
The Legal Examiner
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

You may also like...