Personalized brain functional sectors guided theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial

    Depression is characterised by disruptions in brain circuitry, and interventions like intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) offer the potential for normalising these circuits and improving clinical symptoms. However, personalised treatment targets for depression remain underexplored. This trial aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of iTBS as an additional treatment to a stable antidepressant regimen in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) by modulating brain circuits identified through personalized brain functional sectors compared with sham treatment. This work is a part of the China Study to Predict Optimised Treatment bioMarkers of Individualised Neuromodulation in Depression project.

    This is a multi-centre, double-blind, sham-controlled randomised trial, with a 2:1 allocation ratio to 21 days of active or sham iTBS. A total of 360 eligible participants, diagnosed with current treatment-resistant unipolar major depressive disorder, who have been on a stable antidepressant regimen for at least 4 weeks and are experiencing moderate-to-severe depressive episodes, will be recruited from seven clinical centres in China. The primary outcome is the change in the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale immediately following 21-day treatment. Secondary outcomes include response rate and remission rate, change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, efficacy sustainability and recurrence within 6 months post-treatment. Additionally, safety, blinding, dropout and potential moderators of response will be examined.

    The study has been approved by each centre’s ethics committee, with the first ethical approval granted by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anding Hospital on 30 December 2022 (approval 2022206FS-2). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals.

    Data are available upon reasonable request. De-identified participant data generated in this study will be available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request, after study completion.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

    Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and serious mood disorder characterised by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness and a lack of interest or pleasure in daily activities. It significantly affects an individual’s ability to function at work and school and overall quality of life. Although MDD is effectively treated by medications, psychotherapy, lifestyle adjustments and neuromodulation techniques, 30%–40% of individuals do not respond to initial antidepressant therapy.1 Additionally, 50% of patients may develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD) after trying various interventions but were ineffective.2 3 Consequently, exploring alternative treatments for TRD patients is an urgent task.

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has received approval from the Food and Drug Administration and wide adoption owing to its encouraging efficacy in treating TRD.4 TMS remission rates in TRD range from 35% to 50%.4 5 However, TMS has not yet reached its full potential and could benefit from treatment approaches tailored to specific functional network organisation of patients.6 Treatment outcomes may differ based on depression severity, specific protocol variations and personal patient characteristics. Nevertheless, no consistent evidence supports that modifying these factors can improve individual outcomes, particularly regarding the additional treatment benefits for patients with TRD who are already taking antidepressant medications. Uncovering the neurobiological mechanisms behind treatment response and precisely modulating brain networks that have causal links between symptoms is a promising strategy for improving TMS efficacy.7 To address these challenges, the ongoing China Study to Predict Optimised Treatment bioMarkers of Individualised Neuromodulation in Depression (SPOTMIND) project, which encompasses several randomised clinical trials (RCT), aims to identify optimal intervention targets within distinct functional circuits, determine optimal intervention parameters such as inter-session intervals and dosages and uncover the neural mechanism underlying the onset of depression and treatment response. As one of the RCTs within SPOTMIND, this study will assess the intervention efficacy targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the frontoparietal network (FPN) in patients with TRD.

    Traditional brain stimulation therapies for depression typically employ a one-site-fits-all targeting approach at the left DLPFC. This region is typically located approximately 5–6 cm (5 cm rule) anterior to the motor cortex8 or identified by using a reverse coregistration method based on fixed coordinates.4 However, this method only allows for approximate targeting of subregions within the DLPFC, lacking a consistent functional circuit across individuals. The inconsistent differentiation among these subregions has led to substantial variation in the targeted functional networks from person to person, likely contributing to variability in clinical outcomes.9 The subgenual cingulate cortex (sgACC) involved in abnormal emotional processing, sadness and depression severity is known to be excitable in depression.10 TMS targeting the DLPFC aims to increase the excitability of the DLPFC and affect the sgACC, thereby ameliorating depression symptoms.11 Functional connectivity (FC) between the DLPFC and sgACC has been related to TMS clinical outcomes across cohorts, scanners and DLPFC targeting methods, and the sgACC was used as a reference region for defining connectivity-guided DLPFC targets.9 12 However, a small effect was found between the sgACC-DLPFC FC and response outcomes in a large cohort.13 Furthermore, the fMRI signal of the sgACC is easily affected by noise, and short scan durations (eg, 6–8 min) are not sufficient to reveal interindividual differences in functional network architecture.14 Therefore, whether sgACC is the right starting point for symptom targets remains warranted, and extensive scan durations are necessary to determine precise personalised targets.15

    Emerging preliminary prospective evidence supports that connectivity-based personalised targeting may enhance clinical outcomes across both invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation modalities.16 17 Neuroimaging studies suggested that dysregulation or alteration in the functioning of the FPN in patients with depression, which is involved in various cognitive functions, including attention, working memory and cognitive control.18 These alterations in the FPN are thought to contribute to cognitive symptoms commonly observed in depression, such as difficulties with concentration and emotional regulation.19 20 Targeting the FPN may normalise the network function and help elucidate the mechanisms underlying FPN dysfunction in depression and its potential therapeutic implications. Prefrontal regions represent the most common TMS therapeutic targets.9 Current targeting approaches are only partially successful, and precisely targeting person-specific functional brain architecture is limited by functional imaging technology and heterogeneity in prefrontal regions.21 To identify consistent TMS targets within the FPN across individuals, we divide the prefrontal cortex into distinct personalized brain functional sectors (pBFS) by applying a previously established individualised parcellation scheme.22 Thus, this multi-centre RCT will examine the clinical effectiveness of pBFS-guided FPN-based DLPFC target with intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in treating patients with TRD.

    This is a multicentre, double-blind and sham-controlled randomised trial among participants with TRD. Eligible participants will be recruited from seven hospitals across five provinces in China, with the Changping Laboratory serving as the trial sponsor and overseeing comprehensive quality control and data management. Participants will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio into active and sham interventions. iTBS interventions will last 21 consecutive days (3 weeks), and participants in both groups will follow the same schedule for post-treatment follow-ups at weeks 6, 12 and 27 (6 months post-treatment). The study flow chart provides an overview of the study design and procedures (figure 1).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1

    Study flowchart. Abbreviations: CGIS, Clinical Global Impression-severity; DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; GAF, Global Assessment Function; FIBSER, Frequency, Intensity, Burden of Side Effects Rating; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD, 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; ISI, Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; RRS, Rumination Response Scale; SHAPS, Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale.

    The sample size is calculated using the two-sample test model within PASS 16.0.4. Parameters are set to achieve 90% power and an inspection level of α=0.05. The effect size estimated by the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)23 for the difference between the active and sham groups is 0.40.8 Considering a dropout rate of 15%, the necessary sample size is 354 participants. We aim to enrol 360 participants.

    Participants diagnosed with TRD will be recruited. Diagnosis will be confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition,24 and treatment resistance will be determined via the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM).25 Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria are provided in table 1.

    Table 1

    Study inclusion and exclusion criteria

    A pre-screening will be conducted over the telephone or in person using a simple questionnaire to determine initial eligibility. Potential participants will then undergo a screening visit for further eligibility assessment. Trained research staff will verify each inclusion/exclusion criterion to confirm study eligibility.

    In both treatment arms, the MT20A and P50 magnetic stimulator paired with a real-time MRI-guided neuronavigation system (Neural Galaxy Inc., Beijing, CN) and equipped with a figure-of-eight coil will be used. Each participant will receive three daily sessions of 1800 pulses per session for 21 days, completing the intervention within 28 days with no more than a 3-day gap. Stimulation intensity is set at 100% resting motor threshold (RMT) with 50 min intervals between sessions. If 100% RMT is intolerable based on participants’ feedback, the intensity may initially be reduced to no less than 80% RMT, with attempts to increase to 100% after participants adapt to the intervention. RMT will be tested weekly. Active and sham treatments will be administered identically in all aspects, except for the stimulation intensity, which is non-therapeutic in the sham condition.

    A treatment record sheet will be filled in daily during the intervention. Each centre will have dedicated TMS operators who receive uniform training and undergo treatment accuracy assessments conducted by Changping Laboratory. Operators who do not meet accuracy standards will receive additional training and supervision until they meet the required standards. They will be instructed to minimise communication with patients and avoid discussing possible group assignments with them.

    During the intervention period, participants will continue their baseline medications, with the dosage and type remaining unchanged unless clinically necessary. If a patient experiences severe insomnia symptoms, intermittent use of sleep medication is allowed, limited to no more than five consecutive days. Approved options include zolpidem (≤10 mg), zopiclone (≤7.5 mg), eszopiclone (≤3 mg) or zaleplon (≤10 mg), with total usage not exceeding 2 weeks during the trial period. No additional psychotropic medications or physical treatments will be permitted during the intervention period. During the follow-up period, medication adjustments will be allowed under physician guidance. Detailed records of concurrent medication use will be maintained throughout the study.

    At the screening visit, participants will complete a questionnaire interview covering sociodemographic information (age, sex and education), clinical evaluations (history of diseases, duration of current episodes and treatment history), medication use (antidepressants, mood stabilisers and psychiatric medications) and physical examinations (blood pressure, height, weight and pulse rate).

    Depression severity and the primary outcome measure will be assessed using the MADRS. To provide a more comprehensive evaluation of depressive symptoms, the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD)26 will be also included as a secondary outcome measure. This dual approach allows for sensitivity to both core mood and somatic/anxiety symptoms. Additional secondary outcomes will include the Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S), Global Assessment Function (GAF) and cognitive functioning. The MADRS and CGI-S will be evaluated at all visits: at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 27. All evaluators of clinician-rated scales will undergo multi-centre consistency training organised by the coordinating centre (Beijing Anding Hospital). Additionally, to explore the neural mechanism underlying heterogeneous depression, various psychological scales will be assessed using the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS),27 Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA),28 Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI),29 Insomnia Severity Index (ISI),30 Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI),31 Rumination Response Scale (RRS)32 and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)33 at baseline and immediately after treatment. Patients will fill out blind assessment forms to indicate the group they believe they were assigned to after all interventions are completed.

    Cognitive impairment will be assessed using two different tools at different centres, measured at baseline and immediately after treatment. The Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery consisting of nine tests34 35 will be used at six clinical centres. Additionally, the Chinese Brief Cognitive Test, consisting of four tests, will be used at one centre, as it became available in China in 2023 after the study initiation at the first six centres.36

    To evaluate the long-term antidepressant effects and relapse rates, a follow-up at 6 months post-treatment will be conducted with individuals who completed the 21-day therapy. These sessions will involve gathering updates on the patient’s current condition and assessing their scores on the MADRS. table 2 displays the schedule and assessments at screening, baseline, intervention and follow-up. Medication modifications, new treatment additions and adverse events (AEs) will be recorded when they occur.

    Table 2

    Study schedule and assessments

    To identify the individualised target and investigate the neural underpinnings of the heterogeneity of depression, participants will have structural and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) scans at baseline and post-treatment. MRI scans will be acquired at each clinical centre using a 3.0 T MRI scanner and employing an imaging sequence specified by Changping Laboratory. Minor parameter adjustments will be made as needed to accommodate variations in scanners. The detailed parameters of the seven centres are listed in table 3.

    The voxel size for structural MRI will be 1 × 1 × 1 mm, and for fMRI scans, standard T2*-weighted echo-planar imaging (repetition time = 3000 ms, echo time = 30 ms, flip angle = 90°, 3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, 5 runs, 360 s/run) will be used. Throughout the 30 min resting-state scans, participants will be instructed to avoid repetitive thoughts, keep their eyes closed and keep their heads still. MRI data will be collected within 7 days before or after the intervention, depending on the availability of the MRI scanners and participants. In instances where the image quality is considered insufficient at pretreatment, patients will be asked to undergo a rescan to ensure a total of at least 24 min (4 runs) resting-state scans of satisfactory quality for accurate target identification. However, post-treatment scans will not require a rescan if the image quality is lacking to prioritise the patient’s rights.

    MRI data collected at baseline and post-treatment will be preprocessed centrally at Changping Laboratory, following procedures described in our previous studies.37 38 Specifically, structural images will be used to reconstruct the cortical surface. Resting-state fMRI data will undergo the following preprocessing steps: 1) removing the first two frames; 2) slice timing and motion correction; 3) global mean signal normalisation across runs; 4) linear detrending and band-pass temporal filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz); 5) regression of covariates, including motion parameters, average signals from the whole-brain, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid and their temporal derivatives; and 6) registration to the surface fsaverage6 template and smoothing with a 6 mm full-width half-maximum kernel in the surface space.

    Treatment target identification using MRI data collected at baseline will be analysed centrally at Changping Laboratory. The precision target for each participant is defined in the left DLPFC and guided by FC. Specifically, the cerebral cortex will be divided into 92 functional sectors using an iterative parcellation algorithm as previously reported.22 A region in the left DLPFC and FPN will be selected as the target parcel, and a vertex within the target parcel on the cerebral gyrus will be selected as the stimulation target. A target sheet containing the patient’s ID, age, MADRS score, target coordinates and location on the brain will be forwarded to TMS operators at each clinical centre.

    Randomisation procedures will be employed following baseline data collection (including clinical assessment and MRI scan). Participants will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the active or sham intervention group before the start of the first treatment session. Stratified block randomisation with variable block sizes will be employed, stratified by study centres and symptom severity defined by MADRS score (MADRS≥34 and MADRS<34). The random allocation sequence will be generated using Clinflash (Clinflash Healthcare Technology). On participant eligibility, an independent unblinded person will obtain a random number corresponding to the participant’s information.

    Participants and their relatives, outcomes evaluators, care providers and investigators will be blinded to the intervention assignments. The active and sham coils are located on separate equipment or within a double-sided coil where the active and sham sides appear the same. To ensure allocation concealment, two electrodes (Skintact RT-34, Leonhard Lang GmbH, Austria) will be placed on participants’ forehead: one centred on the nose and the other placed about 1–5 cm laterally, with both located approximately 1 cm above the eyebrows. Focal electrical stimulation will be delivered at the participant’s maximum tolerable intensity to mimic the cutaneous sensation produced by active magnetic stimulation.39 40 The equipment or coil designated as active or sham is labelled discreetly ‘A’ and ‘B’. The actual identity of ‘active’ or ‘sham’ corresponding to ‘A’ or ‘B’ is known only to independent unblinded personnel. Following the random allocation of treatment groups, this unblinded person will send the group information to the treatment operator, who remains blind to the active or sham assignment. The operator will be instructed to use A or B of the coil or equipment for treatment. Usage of A or B will be recorded by the operators on the treatment record sheet after each session to ensure correct usage.

    Patients will be instructed not to discuss their therapeutic experiences with others. Clinical evaluators will work independently from operators and will not have access to any treatment-related information. Everyone involved will be required not to ask and discuss the treatment group. Unblinding must be restricted and allowed only when necessary for participant management, particularly in situations involving serious AEs (SAEs). After all interventions, patients will complete a blind assessment form to indicate the group assignment they believe they were in.

    The primary outcome is the change in MADRS immediately following the 21-day intervention. The secondary outcomes are the response rate defined by MADRS reduction ≥50% and remission rate defined by MADRS <11; changes observed in HAMD, CGI-S and GAF; cognition change; AEs; and dropout rate.

    All scale evaluators must have a minimum of 3 years of professional experience in mood disorders or related fields. They will undergo training and pass an examination on clinical scale consistency assessment organised by the coordinating centre (Beijing Anding Hospital). Similarly, all TMS operators will participate in technical training and pass an examination on operating TMS equipment organised by Changping Laboratory. Furthermore, all researchers involved in this study will attend technical training organised by Changping Laboratory, covering aspects including the study protocol, informed consent, case report form and quality control.

    Each centre and Changping Laboratory have quality control teams. Each site conducts comprehensive self-examinations of the entire clinical trial process. Additionally, on enrolment of the first two participants and approximately every five participants thereafter, the sponsor dispatches a highly trained and dedicated clinical research associate for on-site monitoring. This ensures strict adherence to the study protocol and standards throughout the implementation phase.

    All data, including information from the screening period and post-enrolment, will be documented in paper case report forms (CRFs). The patient’s personal information will not exist in the CRF; instead, a unified ID number will be used for identification. On completion of the trial, the CRF will be forwarded to Changping Laboratory. Two persons will independently input the data from the CRF into a database established using Epidata version 3.1. The two datasets will be compared and verified, with any discrepancies resolved to produce the final validated dataset. In cases where patients deviate from the protocol and are potentially subject to exclusion from statistical analysis, investigators from Changping Laboratory and each clinical centre will discuss and jointly determine whether these participants should be excluded from the analysis.

    Unless otherwise specified, all hypothesis testing will be two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. Statistical analyses will be conducted by two independent statisticians using SAS 9.4 and MATLAB R2020a (The MathWorks, Inc., 2020).

    Study populations

    The primary analysis will follow the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach based on all randomised participants who have received treatment and completed at least one assessment after treatment initiation.

    The sensitivity analyses will use the per-protocol (PP) dataset. The dataset will include participants who complete the 21-day treatment and the primary endpoint assessment without major deviations from the research protocol. To be included in the PP dataset, participants must meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, complete the 21-day treatment within the assigned group without missing more than three consecutive days, avoid changes in medication or the addition of new therapies and complete assessments within the prespecified time windows.

    The safety population will include all randomised participants who receive at least one treatment and will be analysed according to the treatment they received.

    Baseline characteristics analysis

    Baseline characteristics of mITT populations will be summarised by the group. This summary will include demographics, antidepressant medical history and baseline symptom characteristics. Continuous variables will be presented with mean and SD, whereas categorical variables will be presented with frequency and percentage. No p-values will be presented for the baseline data because of chance differences between groups; however, potential adjustments for baseline imbalances will be addressed in sensitivity analyses.

    Efficacy analysis

    The primary analysis will evaluate whether treatment with an active pBFS-guided intervention yields greater symptom reduction, measured by MADRS, compared with the sham group at week 3 within the mITT dataset. Linear mixed models (LMMs) will be used to assess group differences in the change in MADRS or other continuous and normally distributed secondary outputs immediately post-treatment. Poisson models will be used to examine the response and remission rates between the two groups. No adjustments for covariates are planned for the primary and secondary efficacy analyses, though covariates may be considered in sensitivity analyses. Missing key efficacy endpoints will be imputed using the last observation carried forward method.

    The identical analysis plan will be replicated using the PP dataset.

    Safety analysis

    A detailed description and listing of the common AEs and SAEs will be provided. χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests will be conducted to compare the proportions of participants experiencing AEs or SAEs between the treatment groups.

    The FIBSER, HAMD item 3 (suicide) and MADRS item 10 (suicidal thoughts) will be compared between groups using LMMs. To evaluate potential cognitive impairment or improvement following the intervention, paired t-tests will be used to assess changes in cognition scores from before to after treatment.

    The first participant was enrolled on 24 May 2023 and is expected to finish in December 2025.

    None.

    The study will be conducted in compliance with this protocol (version: V006, dated 6 September 2023) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Protocol modifications are communicated to all investigators and updated in the trial registry. Ethical approval has been obtained from each centre’s ethics committee, with the first ethical approval granted by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anding Hospital on 30 December 2022(Approval 2022206FS-2). The study was registered on 17 January 2023 (ChiCTR2300067671).

    Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. A sample consent form is shown in the online supplemental material. Participants will receive approximately 200 RMB for each visit as compensation for their time and transportation costs related to trial follow-ups. Payment methods and schedules are determined by each centre. Participants will be informed of their right to receive active intervention after trial completion if they were initially assigned to the sham group.

    The tolerability and safety of the iTBS during the intervention will be recorded by TMS operators. However, operators are instructed to minimise communication during the intervention and will not actively inquire about discomfort. Reports of discomfort will be documented only if participants initiated the feedback. If any participant is identified as being at risk to themselves (such as suicidal ideation) or showing signs of developing an SAE, they will be referred to appropriate clinical services.

    Given the well-established safety profile of iTBS, an independent Data Monitoring Committee is not required for this study. Safety oversight will instead be conducted by the principal investigator at each site, with all AEs documented and reported to the relevant ethics committees for review.

    The findings from this trial will be shared via academic conferences and published in international peer-reviewed journals by Changping Laboratory following data clearance, trial locking and statistical analysis by professional teams. Each centre is restricted from distributing interim or incomplete results before the official results are presented.

    This protocol represents, to our knowledge, the first investigation that assesses whether personalising the circuit-based target of accelerated iTBS treatment improves efficacy for patients with TRD in a multi-centre, double-blind and sham-controlled trial. This marks a pivotal step towards developing personalised interventions tailored to individual patients.

    Despite TMS being approved for TRD treatment 15 years ago,8 its full potential remains unrealised. Innovative and effective strategies are urgently needed to comprehend how treatments alleviate depression and to guide subsequent interventions. Factors such as dosage and target selection likely contribute to this issue. In 2022, the introduction of Stanford neuromodulation therapy with extremely high doses (10 sessions comprising 1 800 pulses per session per day) marked a shift towards MRI-guided targets.5 However, the lack of verification in multi-centre studies with large sample sizes hinders its widespread adoption. Furthermore, it is unclear what functional circuits are being targeted by the sgACC-based anticorrelation approach. To address these challenges, we administer three sessions of 1 800 pulses per day, each lasting approximately 2.5 hours, which is feasible for patients in clinical settings. We hypothesise that extended TMS protocols may induce more gradual and enduring network-level adaptations that support sustained mood regulation. In contrast, delivering a high dose over a short period may induce transient neuroplastic changes that are less stable, increasing the risk of symptom relapse. Therefore, our protocol delivers a comparable or even higher total pulse dose over 21 days conservatively and progressively to enhance both the efficacy and durability of treatment response.

    Numerous RCTs have investigated TMS intervention for adult patients with depression; however, only three multi-centre and sham-controlled RCTs have been conducted.8 40 41 Two of these studies found that active TMS intervention led to greater symptom improvement than sham in medication-free patients.8 The third study,41 however, found no benefits in US Veterans with depression who were on medication. Given the complexity of TRD and the impracticality of including only medication-free patients, we will include individuals on a stable antidepressant regimen to evaluate the potential add-on benefits of FPN-guided DLPFC iTBS. Considering the potentially high sham efficacy of neurostimulation, influenced by patient characteristics and hospital reputation, we select sham as the control group. While electrical stimulation is used to mimic the somatosensory experience of TMS, it may not fully replicate the sensory profile of magnetic stimulation and may exert its therapeutic effects. These limitations underscore the need for a cautious interpretation of treatment efficacy.

    Although a study discussed imaging-guided target research,6 only one multi-centre RCT prospectively examined the efficacy of personalised neuromodulation in connectivity-based DLPFC42 and found equal efficacy between connectivity-based iTBS and standard rTMS in TRD patients.16 The present multi-centre RCT targets the FPN circuit, a core network associated with mood disorders. Personalised functional targeting requires extended resting-state fMRI scans (eg, 30 min in this study) to ensure reliability, which increases both cost and scanning difficulty. In contrast, the traditional ‘5 cm’ method relies solely on structural MRI, making it more feasible for clinical use. Future head-to-head trials are needed to determine whether personalised targets offer superior outcomes compared with the conventional ‘5 cm’ approach.

    Several challenges may arise from this study, such as patients having difficulty recalling their medication history, maintaining stable treatment for 21 days and tolerating the lengthy MRI scans required. If this RCT confirms personalised targeting effectiveness and sustains efficacy for 2–6 months, patients can continue using this target during maintenance intervention. Additionally, improving imaging processing techniques can yield improved FC and personalised targets with shorter scan times.

    In conclusion, this protocol signifies a significant milestone in advancing personalised therapeutic approaches for TRD treatment, bringing us closer to realising personalised, imaging-guided neuromodulation in clinical practice.

    Data are available upon reasonable request. De-identified participant data generated in this study will be available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request, after study completion.

    Consent obtained directly from patient(s)

    This study involves human participants and was approved by 1. The Ethics Committee of Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, ID: 2022206FS-2; 2. The Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), ID: 2022-57; 3. The Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, ID: 1767; 4. The Medical Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, ID: 2022-163; 5. The Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University, ID: 83220417; 6. The Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin Anding Hospital (Tianjin Mental Health Center), ID: 2022-37; 7. The Medical Ethics Committee of the Fifth People’s Hospital of Luoyang, ID: LYWY-KT-2023004 Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    Read the full text or download the PDF: