Gov't sued over appointment of COP Kofi Boakye to Police Council
A Ghanaian businesswoman and gender activist, Henrietta Nana Yaa Simpson, has filed a lawsuit at the Supreme Court challenging what she describes as the unconstitutional appointment of the Commissioner of Police (Rtd.) Nathan Kofi Boakye to the Ghana Police Council.
In her writ, Ms. Simpson argues that COP (Rtd.) Boakye’s appointment to the position designated for a representative of the National Association of Retired Police Officers (NARPO) violates both the 1992 Constitution and the Police Service Act.
She insists that the duly elected president of the association, Assistant Commissioner of Police (Rtd.) Florence Arthur should rightfully occupy the Council seat.
According to Ms. Simpson, the Police Council is made up of 10 members as defined by law, including a single representative from NARPO.
She contends that President John Mahama unilaterally appointed Mr. Boakye to represent retired senior police officers without consulting the association or accepting its nominee, ACP (Rtd.) Arthur, the first woman to be elected NARPO president.
The suit, filed on Monday, June 23, 2025, names Mr. Boakye as the first defendant, the Police Council as the second, and the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice as the third.
It invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Articles 2, 130, 17(1), 201, and 296 of the 1992 Constitution and Rule 45 of the Supreme Court Rules (C.I. 16).
Ms. Simpson is seeking several declarations, including:
She is also asking the court to order the removal of Mr. Boakye from the Council and the installation of ACP (Rtd.) Arthur in his place.
Ms Simpson’s suit asserts that the conduct of the Presidency undermines institutional autonomy, established convention, and constitutional provisions regarding appointments, and that it risks setting a precedent for gender bias in high-level appointments.
The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
