One month after the European Commission put forward its proposal for a Mid-term review of Cohesion funds programmes 2021-27, COTER members shared their views about the review, which would allow possibility regional investments to be re-directed towards priorities such as housing, water resilience and security. Managing authorities of cohesion programmes from France (Hauts-de-France region), Spain (Extremadura region), Greece (Attica region) and Croatia (the Ministry for Regional Development and EU Funds) joined local and regional leaders for a debate with a representative from the European Commission, The discussion highlighted that, despite initial delays, the absorption rate of cohesion funds is now accelerating quickly.  

All speakers emphasised the importance of having a bottom-up approach as a means to promote economic and social convergence in every region. They opposed any attempt to centralise the governance of Cohesion Policy, both now and in the future. Many members therefore stressed the need to preserve Cohesion Policy’s key principles beyond 2027: partnership, shared management, multi-level governance, and a place-based approach. 

Several speakers called for more flexible rules and less bureaucracy, particularly with regard to overlapping audit procedures, in order to make the use of resources more efficient. In this context, some managing authorities and COTER members noted that the European Commission’s proposal for the Mid-term Review was published after the official deadline for regions to submit their contribution according to existing rules (end of March). As a result, regions that had already submitted their contributions - built on the priorities and regulation already in force – may now be requested to review them in light of the new guidelines. This, they argued, would require extra bureaucratic work on authorities already struggling with limited human resources. 

A specific focus on the urgency of tackling the urban-rural divide in Europe was at the heart of a debate with Denis Nesci (IT/ECR), Member of the European Parliament and rapporteur for ‘Strengthening rural areas in the EU through Cohesion Policy’ and Thibault Guignard (EPP/FR) rapporteur on the LEADER opinion which was recognised to be one of the success story of the cohesion policy. Citizens should have the right to live in rural areas with access to basic services such as health facilities and schools, local leaders said, and a reinforced Cohesion Policy is the best tool the European Union has at its disposal to achieve this objective.  

During a debate on transport poverty, COTER members stressed that territorial disparities emerging from the EU’s green and digital mobility transition pose a growing challenge in regions, particularly in remote, rural, and cross-border regions, where public transport services are either inadequate or unaffordable. Participants stressed that local and regional authorities must play a leading role in planning and implementing the Social Climate Fund, emphasising that national plans should be developed through meaningful consultation with regional stakeholders to ensure that funding addresses real, on-the-ground needs and supports accessible, sustainable mobility for all. With a view to an upcoming legislative proposal on the decarbonisation of corporate fleets, members drew attention to difficulties in accessing zero-emission vehicles, limited local supply chains, and a lack of clarity about financial support available for fleet renewal. They called for stronger EU-level support, flexibility in implementation, and place-based approaches to ensure that no region is left behind in the mobility transition.  

Vasco Alves Cordeiro (PT/PES), Chair of the COTER commission and member of the regional assembly of the Azores: “Today's debate laid bare an undeniable truth: the power of cohesion policy is rooted in the relentless engagement of our regional and local authorities. Members of the Committee of the Regions stood resolute, demanding that the long-term dimension of the cohesion policy remains. Only through such long-term approach can we achieve its effective implementation. However, the European Commission's newly proposed mid-term review appears to go the wrong course. New priorities necessitate new resources; this is not a time for mere adjustments but for bold action. Europe stands at a crossroads, and we must seize this moment to forge a path towards a truly united and resilient future.”