Navigation

© Zeal News Africa

Tanzania Erupts: Suluhu's Presidential Win Sparks Fury, Election Results Rejected Amidst SADC Warnings

Published 19 hours ago2 minute read
Pelumi Ilesanmi
Pelumi Ilesanmi
Tanzania Erupts: Suluhu's Presidential Win Sparks Fury, Election Results Rejected Amidst SADC Warnings

Tanzania's political landscape is currently marked by significant contention following the recent presidential election. The main opposition party, CHADEMA, has vehemently rejected the official results, labeling them as "fake" and "illegitimate." Deogratias Munishi, the party's secretary, asserted that a genuine election did not take place in Tanzania, thereby casting considerable doubt on the declared victory of President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

Despite these rejections, the electoral commission officially announced President Suluhu as the winner of the October 29 vote, stating she secured nearly 98% of the ballots cast. Subsequently, President Suluhu officially received her certificate as the president-elect, further solidifying her declared mandate amidst the ongoing political dispute.

In response to the escalating challenges, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) has reaffirmed its commitment to assisting in facilitating a peaceful resolution through appropriate mechanisms. SADC has issued an urgent appeal for an immediate cessation of hostilities and has strongly urged all involved parties to prioritize the well-being and livelihoods of the people of the United Republic of Tanzania. The organization emphasized the critical importance of embracing peaceful and constructive dialogue as the most effective avenue for addressing grievances, with a collective aspiration for the restoration of harmony and stability in the nation, aligning with shared regional visions of good governance, social cohesion, and sustainable development.

Further complicating the narrative are allegations surrounding another opposition political party, ACT Wazalendo. It has been claimed that ACT Wazalendo was "allowed" to win two seats, suggesting a deliberate decision to create an appearance of a credible election. Critics argue that this maneuver was intended to project an image of electoral integrity rather than reflecting genuine competition, indicating potential manipulation within the election process.

Loading...
Loading...

You may also like...