However, environmentalists said they are in support of the ban, citing the need to preserve the environment and reduce waste.

  Director-General of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Segun Ajayi-Kadir, last week, urged the state government to reconsider its stance, saying the decision was not informed by credible data, out of tune with the reality of Nigeria’s socio-economic situation and bereft of more ingenious and beneficial solutions. 

The DG said hundreds of jobs are at risk as over 89 per cent of operators in the plastic value chain depend on the trade of these SUPs as their main source of income.

  A former MAN chair, Apapa branch and Executive Director, Universal Luggage Ltd, Frank Ike Onyebu, expressed worry that several manufacturers will be affected, adding that with all the problems the country has, especially low industrialisation, a ban is not needed now.    

  “This should not be our priority right now. Most SUPs are already being recycled, even though the numbers could be better. For instance, we need items like sachet water and nylon in our factory, but we don’t even get enough because of the country’s poor waste management and low awareness. Some supermarkets no longer give nylon bags to customers but ask you to buy, doesn’t that defeat the whole purpose of reducing nylon use?” he queried.

  He expressed concern that more companies keep shutting down daily and urged the state government not to add to this statistic, but instead, come to a homegrown solution that works for all.  

   The government should be encouraging manufacturers, especially during these tough times. We are not saying the environment is not important, but the government should step up its recycling efforts and encourage the players already in that field. What works in Europe and the U.S. will not necessarily work here, and the fact that they banned nylons doesn’t mean we should rush and copy them.

However, an environmentalist and Chief Executive Officer, Taiwo Adewole and Associates, Taiwo Adewole, said the manufacturers are not sincere. He said they were given 18 months’ notice before the ban was effected and had more than enough time to arrive at a solution.

  Noting that the federal government came up with the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) to encourage manufacturers to think about end use and recycling, he said plastic bottles were exempted from the ban because those manufacturers made EPR provisions.

  “Sprite, for instance, changed its green bottle to a clear one to make it easier to recycle. What are the SUP producers doing to tackle waste and improve recycling?

  “Our canals and gutters are loaded with a lot of waste, and most of these plastics are not biodegradable. Our environment should come first before profit,” he said.

  Urging the manufacturers to meet Producer Responsibility Obligations (PRO) to ensure the end of life of these products does not affect the environment, he urged them to upgrade the materials being used for plastics production and make provisions for buyback, as the burden lies with them more.