A CONTROVERSIAL bill introduced by Republican lawmakers in the United States is sending shockwaves through Africa’s burgeoning fintech ecosystem. The legislation, which seeks to impose a 5 percent tax on money transfers sent by non-citizens, could severely disrupt the remittance channels that serve as a lifeline for millions across the African continent.
The proposed law would require money transfer services to verify a sender’s immigration status, and apply a surcharge unless the sender is a US citizen. Framed as a move to bolster national security and trade enforcement, the bill has triggered immediate backlash from rights groups, industry analysts, and fintech operators, who argue that it unfairly penalises immigrant communities.
If enacted, the tax could hit African families hard. The United States remains a top remittance source for Africa, with an estimated $13bn sent to the continent annually. In 2021 alone, Nigeria received $5.7bn in remittances from the US, underscoring how dependent many African economies and households are on these funds.
‘This proposal risks crippling the remittance infrastructure that millions rely on to survive,’ said one fintech operator, reacting to the bill’s potential implications.
African startups in the cross-border payments space—such as LemFi, NALA, Kuda, and Moniepoint—have rapidly gained traction by offering cheaper, faster, and more accessible money transfer services. These companies have become critical players in bridging financial gaps between the diaspora and their families back home.
The timing of the bill could not be more disruptive for African fintechs, which have recently seen significant investor interest. LemFi raised $53 million in new funding, while NALA secured $40 million in 2023, reflecting growing confidence in the remittance sector’s long-term viability.
But the proposed surcharge threatens that outlook. If transaction volumes drop due to higher costs, fintechs may be forced to revise pricing models, scale down expansion plans, or rethink product offerings. Investors, meanwhile, may view the regulatory uncertainty as a red flag, cooling funding flows to the sector.
While African governments have so far remained quiet, diplomatic pushback could intensify if the bill moves forward. Mexico has already condemned the proposal, with its US ambassador calling the tax discriminatory and unjust.
Analysts warn that similar backlash could follow from African nations whose economies are deeply intertwined with diaspora contributions. The World Bank estimates that Africa received over $90bn in remittance inflows in 2024, funds that often outstrip foreign aid and direct investment.
The bill, if passed, could set a troubling precedent, exposing African fintechs to further geopolitical risks in key global markets like the US. As stakeholders assess the fallout, one thing is clear: the future of Africa’s remittance revolution may now depend on Washington’s next move.
